Well, R-devel is 'under developemnt'. That log is from Jan 22, and
the message shouild no longer occur on Jan 25.
The help build process for R 2.9.0 is so far off final form that you
just need some patience.
It would be helpful to mention in your subject line that this is for a
development
So you don't need this: you just need to replace Rblas.dll.
DLLs can contain initialization code: that is standard Windows'
practice so please read up on it.
On Sat, 24 Jan 2009, sachin1234 wrote:
hi Antonio,
The name's Sachin :) . I need this because im not implementing the ATLAS,
fast
MS == Marc Schwartz marc_schwa...@comcast.net
on Fri, 23 Jan 2009 08:41:38 -0600 writes:
MS on 01/23/2009 07:36 AM Martin Maechler wrote:
TP == Tony Plate tpl...@acm.org on Thu, 22 Jan
2009 11:01:21 -0700 writes:
TP Martin Maechler wrote:
TP == Tony Plate
Dieter Menne wrote:
Duncan Murdoch murdoch at stats.uwo.ca writes:
I don't know what's going wrong on your system. I added a browser()
call to the .onLoad function in R/windows/FirstLib.R on my system, and I
see it successfully gets JAVA_HOME from the registry. It gets a number
of other
On 1/26/2009 7:04 AM, Duncan Murdoch wrote:
Dieter Menne wrote:
Duncan Murdoch murdoch at stats.uwo.ca writes:
I don't know what's going wrong on your system. I added a browser()
call to the .onLoad function in R/windows/FirstLib.R on my system, and I
see it successfully gets JAVA_HOME
Hi All:
The p-value of Spearman's rank correlation test is calculated using algorithm
AS 89. However, the way how AS 89 is used incures error, which may be an order
of magnitude larger than the error of the original algorithm.
In case of no ties AS 89 expects an even value of the statistic
S =
Duncan,
thanks for the analysis, I have updated rJava to check for the
truncation and issue a warning with the kb link when detected. I have
also made sure to not use file.path since it's using the wrong
separator. The updated rJava version (0.6-2) should be available on
CRAN soon.
Peter Dalgaard wrote:
Now that I've asked you in, I probably should at least chip in with a
couple of brief notes on the issue:
- not everything can be validated, and it's not like the commercial
companies are validating everything. E.g. nonlinear regression code will
give different results
On Sun, Jan 25, 2009 at 4:20 PM, Peter Dalgaard
p.dalga...@biostat.ku.dk wrote:
- a good reason to want post-install validation is that validity can depend
on other part of the system outside developer control (e.g. an overzealous
BLAS optimization, sacrificing accuracy and/or standards
A recently committed revison of R-devel (47740) has introduced a new
mechanism for ordering superclasses consistently, with related changes
for selecting inherited methods.
As part of the process, a function testInheritedMethods has been
introduced that examines method selection for the
10 matches
Mail list logo
