[Rd] r-devel tarball build failure on windows

2009-03-10 Thread Hiroyuki Kawakatsu
Hi, On my windows (xp) machine with Rtools29 (excluding cygwin dlls as I have cygwin on my path) -make all recommended- for the latest R-devel tarball (svn revision: 48093) fails when trying to build the recommended packages: --- Making recommended packages - installing recommended package

Re: [Rd] r-devel tarball build failure on windows

2009-03-10 Thread Uwe Ligges
Hiroyuki Kawakatsu wrote: Hi, On my windows (xp) machine with Rtools29 (excluding cygwin dlls as I have cygwin on my path) -make all recommended- for the latest R-devel tarball (svn revision: 48093) fails when trying to build the recommended packages: 1. Have you asked make

[Rd] [boot] bootstrap issue when at least one strata has only one (PR#13586)

2009-03-10 Thread dsoudant
Full_Name: Dominique Soudant Version: 2.4.1 OS: Winbdows Submission from: (NULL) (134.246.54.61) R 2.4.1 boot 1.2-27 Let us consider the following example with 8 strata, one observation for each : library(boot) df - data.frame(Values=runif(8),month=1:8) df Values month 1 0.02721540

Re: [Rd] S4 generic masking S3 generic when using namespace

2009-03-10 Thread Sklyar, Oleg (London)
Try using setGeneric(predict) without further arguments, this should work as it will take the existing 'predict' definition and convert it into S4 generic. This works nicely for me for all plot, print etc methods * R *** R 2.9.0 (svn -r 47821) [/share/research/R-devel/20090203/lib64/R] ***

Re: [Rd] r-devel tarball build failure on windows

2009-03-10 Thread Peter Dalgaard
Uwe Ligges wrote: Hiroyuki Kawakatsu wrote: Hi, On my windows (xp) machine with Rtools29 (excluding cygwin dlls as I have cygwin on my path) -make all recommended- for the latest R-devel tarball (svn revision: 48093) fails when trying to build the recommended packages: 1. Have you

[Rd] suggestion/request: install.packages and unnecessary file modifications

2009-03-10 Thread Mark.Bravington
Dear R-devel When 'install.packages' runs, it updates all html files in all packages. Mostly, there seems to be no actual change to the html file contents, but the date/time does change. This has causing been me a bit of trouble, because I keep synchronized versions of R on several different

[Rd] [SoC09-Idea] cranlab.

2009-03-10 Thread Manuel J. A. Eugster
Hi everybody, just another Google Summer of Code project idea. Best, Manuel. -- cranlab -- You can't control what you can't measure [0] Mentor: Manuel J. A. Eugster Summary: The aim of this project is the (1)

[Rd] [SoC09-Idea] Integrated debugger

2009-03-10 Thread Romain Francois
Hello, Hello, Here is an idea for a google summer of code project I am willing to mentor. Romain Summary: Create an integrated debugger. Required skills: R skills. Experience of using a debugger. Front-end skills depending on the chosen front-end(s). Description: Debugging R code usually

[Rd] surprising behaviour of names-

2009-03-10 Thread Wacek Kusnierczyk
playing with 'names-', i observed the following: x = 1 names(x) # NULL 'names-'(x, 'foo') # c(foo=1) names(x) # NULL where 'names-' has a functional flavour (does not change x), but: x = 1:2 names(x) # NULL 'names-'(x, 'foo') # c(foo=1, 2)

Re: [Rd] surprising behaviour of names-

2009-03-10 Thread Peter Dalgaard
Wacek Kusnierczyk wrote: playing with 'names-', i observed the following: x = 1 names(x) # NULL 'names-'(x, 'foo') # c(foo=1) names(x) # NULL where 'names-' has a functional flavour (does not change x), but: x = 1:2 names(x) # NULL

Re: [Rd] r-devel tarball build failure on windows

2009-03-10 Thread Hiroyuki Kawakatsu
On 3/10/09, Uwe Ligges wrote: Peter Dalgaard wrote: Uwe Ligges wrote: Hiroyuki Kawakatsu wrote: Hi, On my windows (xp) machine with Rtools29 (excluding cygwin dlls as I have cygwin on my path) -make all recommended- for the latest R-devel tarball (svn revision:

Re: [Rd] surprising behaviour of names-

2009-03-10 Thread Wacek Kusnierczyk
Peter Dalgaard wrote: Wacek Kusnierczyk wrote: playing with 'names-', i observed the following: x = 1 names(x) # NULL 'names-'(x, 'foo') # c(foo=1) names(x) # NULL where 'names-' has a functional flavour (does not change x), but: x = 1:2

Re: [Rd] ?as.POSIXct (PR#13587)

2009-03-10 Thread Prof Brian Ripley
On Tue, 10 Mar 2009, lbrag...@gmail.com wrote: Full_Name: Luca Braglia Version: 2.8 OS: Windows Submission from: (NULL) (85.18.136.110) From ?as.POSIXct ## SPSS dates (R-help 2006-02-17) z - c(10485849600, 10477641600, 10561104000, 10562745600) as.Date(as.POSIXct(z,

Re: [Rd] surprising behaviour of names-

2009-03-10 Thread Stavros Macrakis
(B) you cannot (easily) predict whether or not x will be modified destructively that's fine, thanks, but i must be terribly stupid as i do not see how this explains the examples above.  where is the x used by something else in the first example, so that 'names-'(x, 'foo') does *not* modify x

Re: [Rd] surprising behaviour of names-

2009-03-10 Thread Wacek Kusnierczyk
Stavros Macrakis wrote: (B) you cannot (easily) predict whether or not x will be modified destructively that's fine, thanks, but i must be terribly stupid as i do not see how this explains the examples above. where is the x used by something else in the first example, so that

Re: [Rd] surprising behaviour of names-

2009-03-10 Thread Wacek Kusnierczyk
Peter Dalgaard wrote: (*) unless you mess with match.call() or substitute() and the like. But that's a different story. different or not, it is a story that happens quite often -- too often, perhaps -- to the degree that one may be tempted to say that the semantics of argument passing in r

Re: [Rd] r-devel tarball build failure on windows

2009-03-10 Thread Prof Brian Ripley
This is another of those things which is not yet finished (you will see mention of the removed cross-building scripts in the relevant Makefile.win). Expect it to work from the tarball before GFF in 10 day's time. There's another intermittent problem with dependencies in the current sources

[Rd] logical comparison of functions (PR#13588)

2009-03-10 Thread michael_karsh
Full_Name: Michael Aaron Karsh Version: 2.8.0 OS: Windows XP Submission from: (NULL) (164.67.71.215) When I try to say if (method==f), where f is a function, it says that the comparison is only possible for list and atomic types. I tried saying if (method!=f), and it gave the same error

Re: [Rd] logical comparison of functions (PR#13588)

2009-03-10 Thread Duncan Murdoch
On 10/03/2009 4:35 PM, michael_ka...@earthlink.net wrote: Full_Name: Michael Aaron Karsh Version: 2.8.0 OS: Windows XP Submission from: (NULL) (164.67.71.215) When I try to say if (method==f), where f is a function, it says that the comparison is only possible for list and atomic types. I

Re: [Rd] logical comparison of functions (PR#13588)

2009-03-10 Thread Wacek Kusnierczyk
Duncan Murdoch wrote: On 10/03/2009 4:35 PM, michael_ka...@earthlink.net wrote: Full_Name: Michael Aaron Karsh Version: 2.8.0 OS: Windows XP Submission from: (NULL) (164.67.71.215) When I try to say if (method==f), where f is a function, it says that the comparison is only possible for

[Rd] dger_ in BLAS definition

2009-03-10 Thread Andrew Redd
I'm developing some software and running into compiling warning: conditionals.c:104: warning: passing argument 4 of 'dger_' discards qualifiers from pointer target type conditionals.c:104: warning: passing argument 6 of 'dger_' discards qualifiers from pointer target type the netlib documentation

Re: [Rd] surprising behaviour of names-

2009-03-10 Thread Wacek Kusnierczyk
i got an offline response saying that my original post may have not been clear as to what the problem was, essentially, and that i may need to restate it in words, in addition to code. the problem is: the performance of 'names-' is incoherent, in that in some situations it acts in a functional

Re: [Rd] dger_ in BLAS definition

2009-03-10 Thread Christophe Dutang
Yes x and y arguments are unchanged on exit, cf. http://www.mathkeisan.com/UsersGuide/man/dger.html This is the work of the R core team to update those files, but I fear there are other functions which are not well declared. Will you agree to take a look at the BLAS.h file? It will be very

Re: [Rd] S4 generic masking S3 generic when using namespace

2009-03-10 Thread Gad Abraham
Sklyar, Oleg (London) wrote: Try using setGeneric(predict) without further arguments, this should work as it will take the existing 'predict' definition and convert it into S4 generic. This works nicely for me for all plot, print etc methods * R *** R 2.9.0 (svn -r 47821)

Re: [Rd] bug (PR#13570)

2009-03-10 Thread Benjamin Tyner
Many thanks Brian for tracking this down. Was it fixed by c next line is not in current dloess goto 7 in ehg136? If this needs to be in the netlib version as well, we should inform Eric Grosse. While we're at it, there are a few more inconsistencies (not nearly

[Rd] libf95.a: could not read symbols?

2009-03-10 Thread Jeff Hamann
I'm sorry for having to post this, but I've run out of ideas. I've been trying to build R-2.8.1 from source for installation on FreeBSD 6.4 (seems to be working fine on osx) and keep getting the same results, regardless of how I set ./configure $ ./configure --enable-R-shlib --with-x=no

[Rd] [SoC09-Idea] RQuantLib

2009-03-10 Thread Dirk Eddelbuettel
RQuantLib -- Bridging R and QuantLib Mentor: Dirk Eddelbuettel Summary: The goal of this Summer of Code project is to a) extend the coverage of QuantLib [1] code available to R by adding more wrapper functions to RQuantLib [2], and to b) provide additional functionality to

Re: [Rd] bug (PR#13570)

2009-03-10 Thread Prof Brian Ripley
On Tue, 10 Mar 2009, Benjamin Tyner wrote: Many thanks Brian for tracking this down. Was it fixed by c next line is not in current dloess goto 7 in ehg136? If this needs to be in the netlib version as well, we should inform Eric Grosse. The difference was in

Re: [Rd] libf95.a: could not read symbols?

2009-03-10 Thread Prof Brian Ripley
Where did FFLAGS come from here (looks like you meant FPICFLAGS)? But that will only postpone the problem: to build R as a shared library you need PIC libraries, and your Fortran library is apparently not PIC (gcc does not generate PIC code by default on x86_64, and g95 as a gcc derivative is