I have taken up the issue now,
and after thinking, studying the source, trying to define a
'method = ' argument, came to the conclusion that both
the implementation and documentation (and source code "self-explanation")
are easiest to program, maintain, and understand,
if I introduce explicit binar
I'm bringing this issue to r-devel as my idea of sending it to r-help
appears to be wrong.
The following is reproducible in R-patched and R-devel (also in older
versions).
An outlier is inserted in group E and the last plot by plot.lm
suggests that the point belongs to D.
It appears to
On 8/21/09, Romain Francois wrote:
> On 08/21/2009 06:59 PM, Deepayan Sarkar wrote:
>
> >
> > On 8/21/09, Romain Francois
> wrote:
> >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > Would it be possible to add the capability for functions to register
> how
> > > they would like to complete themselves.
> > >
> > > Curren
On 8/21/09, Vitalie S. wrote:
> On Fri, 21 Aug 2009 11:21:03 +0200, Romain Francois
> wrote:
>
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > Would it be possible to add the capability for functions to register how
> they would like to complete themselves.
> >
> > Currently, there is the .addFunctionInfo, but it allows only
On Fri, 21 Aug 2009 11:21:03 +0200, Romain Francois
wrote:
Hi,
Would it be possible to add the capability for functions to register how
they would like to complete themselves.
Currently, there is the .addFunctionInfo, but it allows only functions
to register a static list of potential
Full_Name: Uwe F. Mayer
Version: 2.9.1
OS: SunOS myhost 5.10 Generic_120012-14 i86pc i386 i86pc Solaris
Submission from: (NULL) (216.113.168.130)
Configuration problem with the creation of shared libraries: Compilation only
succeeds if SHLIB_LDFLAGS="-shared" is added to the configure command lin
On 08/21/2009 06:59 PM, Deepayan Sarkar wrote:
On 8/21/09, Romain Francois wrote:
Hi,
Would it be possible to add the capability for functions to register how
they would like to complete themselves.
Currently, there is the .addFunctionInfo, but it allows only functions to
register a stat
On 8/21/09, Romain Francois wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Would it be possible to add the capability for functions to register how
> they would like to complete themselves.
>
> Currently, there is the .addFunctionInfo, but it allows only functions to
> register a static list of potential completions, I was t
Thank you, that's a plausible explanation and probably also explains
PR#13899.
However, it's not listed by POSIX (not even a 'may fail') at
http://www.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/009695399/functions/mkdir.html
and nor is it described on man -s2 mkdir on my Solaris 10 system, so
it is not surprisin
That's nifty. Perhaps it could look into
/foo/bar/baz/lib1/*/R
in which case one could simply place source
packages in /foo/bar/baz/lib1
In fact it would be nice if R had built into it some way
of running code in source packages possibly with
degraded functionality to ease development, i.e.
I'm often wanting to develop functions whilst manipulating data. But I
don't want to end up with a .RData full of functions and data. It
might be that I have functions that are re-usable but not worth
sticking in a package.
So I've tried to come up with a paradigm for function development
that mo
Hi,
Would it be possible to add the capability for functions to register how
they would like to complete themselves.
Currently, there is the .addFunctionInfo, but it allows only functions
to register a static list of potential completions, I was thinking of a
way to register not a fixed list
On Fri, 21 Aug 2009, Peter Dalgaard wrote:
Liviu Andronic wrote:
Dear R devels
Yesterday I was slightly surprised to notice that R incorrectly
detected some of the locale settings. I am not sure whether this is
important, but I preferred to drop a message. In the R output below,
some entries th
On Fri, 21 Aug 2009, Peter Dalgaard wrote:
Prof Brian Ripley wrote:
[snip]
In fact you did not specifically not request nls: use the flag from the
gcc specs below to do so (as someone did for gcc).
Brian, I see --disable-nls in both places, so you may want to expand on
that. (I could well be
Prof Brian Ripley wrote:
[snip]
> In fact you did not specifically not request nls: use the flag from the
> gcc specs below to do so (as someone did for gcc).
Brian, I see --disable-nls in both places, so you may want to expand on
that. (I could well be missing the point, but then I'd like to know
Liviu Andronic wrote:
> Dear R devels
> Yesterday I was slightly surprised to notice that R incorrectly
> detected some of the locale settings. I am not sure whether this is
> important, but I preferred to drop a message. In the R output below,
> some entries that should have been "en_GB.UTF-8" are
Dear R devels
Yesterday I was slightly surprised to notice that R incorrectly
detected some of the locale settings. I am not sure whether this is
important, but I preferred to drop a message. In the R output below,
some entries that should have been "en_GB.UTF-8" are presented as "C".
Regards
Liviu
17 matches
Mail list logo
