On 2/20/10 7:50 AM, Peter Dalgaard wrote:
> You don't want to understand, believe me! ;-)
>
> It's a bug, probably not the very worst kind, but accessing memory that
> isn't yours is potentially harmful (but writing to it is considerably
> worse).
>
> Looks like the issue only concerns the right
On 2/20/10 7:50 AM, Peter Dalgaard wrote:
> You don't want to understand, believe me! ;-)
>
> It's a bug, probably not the very worst kind, but accessing memory that
> isn't yours is potentially harmful (but writing to it is considerably
> worse).
>
> Looks like the issue only concerns the right
On Sat, Feb 20, 2010 at 08:00:13PM +0100, Peter Dalgaard wrote:
> G. Jay Kerns wrote:
> >On Sat, Feb 20, 2010 at 1:18 PM, Peter Dalgaard
> > wrote:
> >>Jens Elkner wrote:
> >>>Hi,
> >>>
> >>>does anybody have the R logo in a vector format preferable SVG?
> >>>Need it for Freedesktop (GNOME desktop)
G. Jay Kerns wrote:
On Sat, Feb 20, 2010 at 1:18 PM, Peter Dalgaard
wrote:
Jens Elkner wrote:
Hi,
does anybody have the R logo in a vector format preferable SVG?
Need it for Freedesktop (GNOME desktop) integration of Rcmdr ...
Thanx,
jel.
Not really. I played around with the tracer in inksc
On Sat, Feb 20, 2010 at 1:18 PM, Peter Dalgaard
wrote:
> Jens Elkner wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> does anybody have the R logo in a vector format preferable SVG?
>> Need it for Freedesktop (GNOME desktop) integration of Rcmdr ...
>>
>> Thanx,
>> jel.
>
> Not really. I played around with the tracer in in
Jens Elkner wrote:
Hi,
does anybody have the R logo in a vector format preferable SVG?
Need it for Freedesktop (GNOME desktop) integration of Rcmdr ...
Thanx,
jel.
Not really. I played around with the tracer in inkscape at some point,
but it didn't come out quite satisfactory. It's a bit of
Hi,
does anybody have the R logo in a vector format preferable SVG?
Need it for Freedesktop (GNOME desktop) integration of Rcmdr ...
Thanx,
jel.
--
Otto-von-Guericke University http://www.cs.uni-magdeburg.de/
Department of Computer Science Geb. 29 R 027, Universitaetsplatz 2
39106 Magdebur
FYI/to the maintainers of r-forge:
R-forge seems to be down:
1. http://r-forge.r-project.org/ gives minimal page "R-Forge Could Not
Connect to Database:".
2. svn+ssh://@svn.r-forge.r-project.org/ - svn requests
does not work.
3. ping svn.r-forge.r-project.org does indeed respond.
/Henrik
__
g.russ...@eos-solutions.com wrote:
Full_Name: George Russell
Version: 2.10.0, 2.11.0 (2009-12-13 r50716)
OS: Windows
Submission from: (NULL) (217.111.3.131)
R trace:
-- cut here --
v <- integer(0)
v[[1]] <- v
v
[1] 20522144
v <- numeric(0)
v[[1]] <- v
v
[1] 4.254131e-314
sessionInfo()
R ve
Confirmed behavior on R version 2.10.1 Patched (2010-01-12 r50990) and
R version 2.11.0 Under development (unstable) (2010-02-14 r51138)
[Windows Vista]:
INTEGERS:
> v <- integer(5)
> v
[1] 0 0 0 0 0
> v[[2]] <- integer(0)
> v
[1] 0 2892960 0 0 0
> v[[4]] <- 1L[c()]
> v
[1]
Full_Name: Eric Goldlust
Version: 2.10.1 (2009-12-14) x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu
OS: Linux 2.6.9-67.0.1.ELsmp x86_64
Submission from: (NULL) (64.22.160.1)
After upgrading to from 2.9.1 to 2.10.1, I get unexpected results when calling
read.csv('/dev/stdin'). These problems go away when I call read
Full_Name: George Russell
Version: 2.10.0, 2.11.0 (2009-12-13 r50716)
OS: Windows
Submission from: (NULL) (217.111.3.131)
R trace:
-- cut here --
> v <- integer(0)
> v[[1]] <- v
> v
[1] 20522144
> v <- numeric(0)
> v[[1]] <- v
> v
[1] 4.254131e-314
> sessionInfo()
R version 2.10.0 (2009-10-26)
i
I wasn't claiming there was an ambiguity but it does not perform
according to the operator precedence documented in ?Syntax . If it
performed as documented it would give an error.
On Sat, Feb 20, 2010 at 6:57 AM, Barry Rowlingson
wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 20, 2010 at 9:52 AM, Gabor Grothendieck
> wr
On Sat, Feb 20, 2010 at 9:52 AM, Gabor Grothendieck
wrote:
> In ?Syntax [ is given as higher priority than $ but BOD$demand[3]
> seems to be the same as (BOD$demand)[3] contrary to [ being higher
> priority.
>
>> BOD$demand[3]
> [1] 19
>> (BOD$demand)[3]
> [1] 19
>
> What is the rule being used he
In ?Syntax [ is given as higher priority than $ but BOD$demand[3]
seems to be the same as (BOD$demand)[3] contrary to [ being higher
priority.
> BOD$demand[3]
[1] 19
> (BOD$demand)[3]
[1] 19
What is the rule being used here?
__
R-devel@r-project.org ma
On 02/20/2010 05:58 AM, yeahzx wrote:
Hi all,
I am not familiar with writing R extensions. In a C program, I want to create a
SEXP and access it in embedded R. How to let the embedded engine know there's a
new vector? For example, after creating a SEXP, parsing 'ls()' in embedded R
and then
Good morning Stavos,
I currently use the following definition in my own environment.
sample.df <- function (df, n = 3) {
df[sample(nrow(df), min(nrow(df), n)), ]
}
I also added in the possibility of returning n sequential rows which I used
when examining address files... but I haven't used i
17 matches
Mail list logo
