I think what people are also thinking about is that the policy for
publishing a package on CRAN is that it have to pass R CMD check with
no errors, warnings *or* notes. So, in that sense notes are no
different from warnings.
At least that's why I go about and add some rare ad hoc code patching
in
Dear all,
I think that "notes" were introduced precisely to differentiate between
situations that may be innocuous and those that are more serious, the latter
producing "warnings" and "errors." The Rcmdr package, for example, generates
a whack of notes for code that works correctly and that I don'
On Apr 16, 2010, at 4:38 AM, Henrik Bengtsson wrote:
> I think what people are also thinking about is that the policy for
> publishing a package on CRAN is that it have to pass R CMD check with
> no errors, warnings *or* notes.
Can you cite your reference, please? I see only (R-ext 1.5 Submitt
Henrik wrote:
I think what people are also thinking about is that the policy for
publishing a package on CRAN is that it have to pass R CMD check with
no errors, warnings *or* notes. So, in that sense notes are no
different from warnings.
-
Getting rid of these n
On Fri, 16 Apr 2010, Therneau, Terry M., Ph.D. wrote:
'Henrik' wrote:
I think what people are also thinking about is that the policy for
publishing a package on CRAN is that it have to pass R CMD check with
no errors, warnings *or* notes. So, in that sense notes are no
different from warnings.
On Fri, 16 Apr 2010, Simon Urbanek wrote:
On Apr 16, 2010, at 4:38 AM, Henrik Bengtsson wrote:
I think what people are also thinking about is that the policy for
publishing a package on CRAN is that it have to pass R CMD check with
no errors, warnings *or* notes.
Can you cite your reference
Please note that the "winbuilder" service will be down during the
weekend (at least until sunday) due work on the power supply of the
building.
Best wishes,
Uwe Ligges
__
R-devel@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-deve
On Fri, Apr 16, 2010 at 5:51 PM, Thomas Lumley wrote:
> On Fri, 16 Apr 2010, Simon Urbanek wrote:
>
>>
>> On Apr 16, 2010, at 4:38 AM, Henrik Bengtsson wrote:
>>
>>> I think what people are also thinking about is that the policy for
>>> publishing a package on CRAN is that it have to pass R CMD ch
