Re: [Rd] Sweave and absolute escaped backslashed Windows paths in R 2.12.0

2010-10-25 Thread Duncan Murdoch
On 25/10/2010 6:24 PM, Duncan Murdoch wrote: Brian Diggs wrote: I've noticed a change in behavior in R 2.12.0 from 2.11.1 regarding the treatment of absolute paths in the file argument of Sweave in a Windows environment. Looks like a bug to me, probably related to the new error reporting. It

Re: [Rd] Sweave and absolute escaped backslashed Windows paths in R 2.12.0

2010-10-25 Thread Duncan Murdoch
Brian Diggs wrote: I've noticed a change in behavior in R 2.12.0 from 2.11.1 regarding the treatment of absolute paths in the file argument of Sweave in a Windows environment. Looks like a bug to me, probably related to the new error reporting. Duncan Murdoch Consider the minimal Rnw file,

[Rd] Sweave and absolute escaped backslashed Windows paths in R 2.12.0

2010-10-25 Thread Brian Diggs
I've noticed a change in behavior in R 2.12.0 from 2.11.1 regarding the treatment of absolute paths in the file argument of Sweave in a Windows environment. Consider the minimal Rnw file, attached and reproduced below my signature in case .Rnw files get stripped. This file is stored on my (W

[Rd] Possible bug with scrambled messages on Win7-64bit using R2.12.0 (32/64 bit version)

2010-10-25 Thread Hans-Peter Suter
When executing 'dyn.load("this/dll/does/not/exist.dll")' the resulting error message is scrambled. Not all characters will be displayed and when I select the empty region text disappears/reappears. For a screenshot see: http://dl.dropbox.com/u/2602516/dyn.load_error1.PNG and http://dl.dropbox.com/

Re: [Rd] "$<-" fails (invalid subscript type 'language')

2010-10-25 Thread Simon Urbanek
On Oct 25, 2010, at 3:51 AM, Vitalie S. wrote: > Simon Urbanek writes: > >> On Oct 24, 2010, at 4:21 PM, Vitalie S. wrote: >> >>> David Winsemius writes: >>> On Oct 24, 2010, at 5:35 AM, Vitalie S. wrote: > > This might be just beyond of my understanding of how assignment

Re: [Rd] "$<-" fails (invalid subscript type 'language')

2010-10-25 Thread Vitalie S.
spinuvit.l...@gmail.com (Vitalie S.) writes: > > I would expect the following to behave identically: > >> tv <- c(a="dsf", b="sss") >> tl <- list(232) > >> `$<-`(tl, tv[[1]], "sdfdsfdsfsd") > Error: invalid subscript type 'language' > >> tl$`tv[[1]]` <- "sdfdsfdsfsd" >> tl > [[1]] > [1] 232 > > $`

Re: [Rd] R-devel CMD build fails when vignette present

2010-10-25 Thread Martin Morgan
On 10/25/2010 03:21 AM, Prof Brian Ripley wrote: > Biobase is not self-contained so I cannot easily test it, but as far as > I know this is now resolved. Thank you it is. Martin > > On Sun, 24 Oct 2010, Martin Morgan wrote: > >> If I try to build a package with a vignette >> >> R CMD build Bio

Re: [Rd] R-devel CMD build fails when vignette present

2010-10-25 Thread Prof Brian Ripley
Biobase is not self-contained so I cannot easily test it, but as far as I know this is now resolved. On Sun, 24 Oct 2010, Martin Morgan wrote: If I try to build a package with a vignette R CMD build Biobase I see * checking for file 'Biobase/DESCRIPTION' ... OK * preparing 'Biobase': * che

Re: [Rd] Plans for tighter integration of reference classes in R.

2010-10-25 Thread Vitalie S.
John Chambers writes: >> >> Not internals of the evaluator, the .environment class. >> Something like: >>- move the .self into a super-class of envRefClass (in this case >> .environment), >>- make the method for `...@` for .environment, such that any update of the >>slots of the ob

Re: [Rd] "$<-" fails (invalid subscript type 'language')

2010-10-25 Thread Vitalie S.
Simon Urbanek writes: > On Oct 24, 2010, at 4:21 PM, Vitalie S. wrote: > >> David Winsemius writes: >> >>> On Oct 24, 2010, at 5:35 AM, Vitalie S. wrote: >>> This might be just beyond of my understanding of how assignment works in R, but the documentation does not say any

Re: [Rd] "$<-" fails (invalid subscript type 'language')

2010-10-25 Thread Vitalie S.
> There are some things you are not really supposed to mess with in R... > Computing the index to $-constructs is one of them (trying to set up a > for loop as a call to `for` is another). It can be done, it's just > rather painful, and most likely not what you wanted in the first place. > Sorry,