[Rd] typo in ?eapply

2010-11-09 Thread Hervé Pagès
Hi, Found in ?eapply (in current R-devel): \value{ A named (unless \code{USE.NAMES = FALSE}) list. Note that the order of the components is arbitrary for hashed environments: currently it will be in the order the name-value pairs were added for unhashed

Re: [Rd] incorrect DLL path for Rbitmap.dll on Windows

2010-11-09 Thread Duncan Murdoch
On 08/11/2010 3:14 PM, Dan Tenenbaum wrote: Hello, I think there is a problem in recent devel builds of R on Windows with various devices from the grDevices package. This should be fixed now, as of today's build. Thanks for the report (and thanks to Brian Ripley for fixing it). Duncan Murd

Re: [Rd] base::as.Date inconsistency/bug

2010-11-09 Thread Prof Brian Ripley
Well, 2.11.0 is overdue for an update: see the posting guide. You've confused the printed representation with the object. If there is an issue, it is in the formatting (and hence printing) of fractional dates before the epoch ("1970-01-01 00:00"). As the help page says It is intended

[Rd] base::as.Date inconsistency/bug

2010-11-09 Thread Andreas Eckner
Dear all, I would like point out a potential bug (or at least inconsistency) in the way the R base package converts numeric numbers to dates. Specifically, consider the following two calls: > as.Date(0.5, origin="1969-12-31") [1] "1970-01-01" > as.Date(0.5, origin="1970-01-01") [1] "1970-01-01"