On Sat, Jan 22, 2011 at 3:08 PM, Vitalie S. wrote:
>
> Hello everyone!
>
> Motivated by the recent post on SO
> http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4730551/making-a-string-concatenation-operator-in-r
>
> I wonder what is the current state of argument on making "+" to
> concatenate character vectors
Hello everyone!
Motivated by the recent post on SO
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4730551/making-a-string-concatenation-operator-in-r
I wonder what is the current state of argument on making "+" to
concatenate character vectors. The "+" method is still sealed for
signature("character", "char
On 21 January 2011 at 11:32, Xiaochun Sun wrote:
| Many thanks for your reply. Rf_rnorm works very good with me.
Glad to hear it helped, and let us know if you have other questions.
Cheers, Dirk
--
Dirk Eddelbuettel | e...@debian.org | http://dirk.eddelbuettel.com
I forgot to state the version of R in my last message.
R version 2.12.1 (2010-12-16)
Copyright (C) 2010 The R Foundation for Statistical Computing
ISBN 3-900051-07-0
Platform: i686-pc-linux-gnu (32-bit)
Survival version 2.36-3 (not yet on CRAN).
__
R-
I'm converting the "Changelog" files that I have used in the survival package
(since the 1980s) to the inst/NEWS.Rd format and a couple of things are not
clear from the help page.
1. What should I use for the name: NEWS or survival?
2. My section headers look like
\section{Changes in ver
Hi all, i am trying to compile a test, calling from C code R Lapack shared
libraries. In particular, i am calling simple LAPACK driver
dposv for solving linear equation system A*x=B with positive definite A. My
code looks like the following in
solve.c
==
#includ
Hi,
I have just encountered a strange behaviour from 'cor' with regards to
the treatment of NAs when calculating Spearman correlations. I guess it
is a subtle bug.
If I understand the help page correctly, the two modes 'complete.obs'
and 'pairwise.complete.obs' specify how to deal with corre
Many thanks for your reply. Rf_rnorm works very good with me.
Xiaochun
On Fri, Jan 21, 2011 at 7:38 AM, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
>
> On 21 January 2011 at 06:44, Douglas Bates wrote:
> | It is more effective to send such inquiries to the Rcpp-devel mailing
> | list which I am cc'ing on this re
