On Mon, 24 Jan 2011, Olaf Mersmann wrote:
Dear R developers,
A recent typo led me to discover, that R is happy to accept
> 20x2
[1] 20
as input. This appears to be related to the parsing of hexadecimal
constants, since there must be a zero before the 'x' (i.e. 2x2 or
02x02 gives the expecte
the version format should be x.y
'Changes in version 2.36' should work...
benilton
On 22 January 2011 15:58, Terry Therneau wrote:
> I'm converting the "Changelog" files that I have used in the survival package
> (since the 1980s) to the inst/NEWS.Rd format and a couple of things are not
> cle
Why do you want to test for normality and equal variances?
If those are really a concern then you should use a method up front that is
robust against those. Those tests are usually testing a hypothesis that is
different from what you are actually interested in and generally have low power
to g
Karthi Subramanian yahoo.ca> writes:
>
> I currently have a program that automates 2-way ANOVA on a series of
> endpoints, but before the ANOVA is carried out I want the code to
> test the assumptions of normality and equal variance and report along
> with each anova result in the
> output fil
On Mon, Jan 24, 2011 at 2:15 PM, Davor Cubranic wrote:
> On 2011-01-23, at 4:34 AM, Gabor Grothendieck wrote:
>
>> On Sun, Jan 23, 2011 at 6:56 AM, Vitalie S. wrote:
>>> Gabor Grothendieck writes:
>>>
Also the gsubfn supports quasi perl style string interpolation that
can sometimes be
On 2011-01-23, at 4:34 AM, Gabor Grothendieck wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 23, 2011 at 6:56 AM, Vitalie S. wrote:
>> Gabor Grothendieck writes:
>>
>>> Also the gsubfn supports quasi perl style string interpolation that
>>> can sometimes be used to avoid the use of paste in the first place.
>>> Just pre
I'm not sure, but note the difference in locale between
Linux (UTF-8) and Windows (non UTF-8). As far as I
understand it R much prefers UTF-8, which Windows doesn't
natively support. Otherwise you could just change your
Windows locale to a UTF-8 locale to make R happier.
My stab in the dark would
On 01/24/2011 08:37 AM, Kasper Daniel Hansen wrote:
> Johann,
>
> whether S4 is "better" than S3 is a heated subject. No-one (I think)
> disputes that S4 is in some sense more flexible (for some suitable
> definition of flexible), but it does incur some performance overhead
> (how much is debatab
I currently have a program that automates 2-way ANOVA on a series of endpoints,
but before the ANOVA is carried out I want the code to test the assumptions of
normality and equal variance and report along with each anova result in the
output file. How can I do this?
I have pasted below the c
Johann,
whether S4 is "better" than S3 is a heated subject. No-one (I think)
disputes that S4 is in some sense more flexible (for some suitable
definition of flexible), but it does incur some performance overhead
(how much is debatable) and some would argue that it also makes code
more complicate
"Janko Thyson" writes:
>> I'm experimenting with a few model-fitting classes of my own. I'm
>> leaning towards using S4 for my classes, but the R functions I'd want
>> to override (residuals, predict, etc.) are all S3 methods.
> For example, inside your method for 'residuals()', you will
> prob
On 23.01.2011 21:21, Janko Thyson wrote:
Dear list,
I was wondering if it is possible to create and use a package namespace at
the development stage of a package. To clarify, I would like to make sure
that my package functions (and not some other functions that happen to have
identical names)
Dear R developers,
A recent typo led me to discover, that R is happy to accept
> 20x2
[1] 20
as input. This appears to be related to the parsing of hexadecimal
constants, since there must be a zero before the 'x' (i.e. 2x2 or
02x02 gives the expected error). All this is under R 2.12.1 on bot
13 matches
Mail list logo
