Thank you very much for these pointers.
In order to lower the risk for proceeding unknowingly with (3) or (4),
I'll keep my post-rename tests for them (understanding that it is
still not bullet proof).
/Henrik
On Tue, Mar 1, 2011 at 11:01 PM, Prof Brian Ripley
wrote:
> As the help says:
>
> Th
On Mon, 28 Feb 2011, Prof Brian Ripley wrote:
Unfortunately it would need a major rewrite, and either piping output through
a pager (surely the standard Unix way to handle this) or redirecting to a
file is the simplest way to do this.
R CMD check calls a process to run .runPackageTestsR, whic
Martin and Professor Ripley,
Thank you very much for your attention and time on this.
I've fixed the package accordingly.
benilton
On 2 March 2011 06:39, Prof Brian Ripley wrote:
> On Tue, 1 Mar 2011, Martin Morgan wrote:
>
>> On 03/01/2011 03:19 PM, Benilton Carvalho wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>
