Dear all,
Now that R has OpenMP facilities, I'm trying to use it for my own package but
I'm still wondering if it is safe to use random number generation within a
OpenMP block. I looked at the R writing extension document both on the OpenMP
and Random number generation but didn't find any
On 22/02/2012 08:23, Mathieu Ribatet wrote:
Dear all,
Now that R has OpenMP facilities,
Hmm, not exactly new.
I'm trying to use it for my own package but I'm still wondering if it
is safe to use random number generation within a OpenMP block. I looked
at the R writing extension document
Hello,
For your information, I plan to release soon a package with a fast and
multithreaded aware RNG for C++ code in R packages.
It is currently part of one of my (not yet accepted) packages and I want to
extract it into its own package.
I plan to do some quick benchmarks too.
Of course I can
Regardless of the page's other merits (looks nice to me), I did enjoy
seeing my favorite teacher's (Dev Basu's) elephant in the Bayesian box.
Thanks for that.
__
R-devel@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel
Hi.
Now that R has OpenMP facilities, I'm trying to use it for my own package but
I'm still wondering if it is safe to use random number generation within a
OpenMP block. I looked at the R writing extension document both on the
OpenMP and Random number generation but didn't find any
Hi,
In a way, a simple text based system is clean and is consistent with
the plain text requirements of the listservs, and interacting with R
through code/text. However, for people with different backgrounds, it
can seem unappealing. I definitely believe your page is more
inviting.
I work at a
Greetings. Answers below.
On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 7:04 AM, Petr Savicky savi...@cs.cas.cz wrote:
Hi.
In the description of your project in the file
http://winstat.quant.ku.edu/svn/hpcexample/trunk/Ex66-ParallelSeedPrototype/README
you argue as follows
Question: Why is this better
(Can we please follow the terminology in the ?ReferenceClasses
documentation. Creativity is fine but here we need communication)
This has come up (once) before off-list. It could be made part of
reference classes via a general rewriting that would improve efficiency
as well. Not imminent,
On Wed, Feb 22, 2012 at 12:17:25PM -0600, Paul Johnson wrote:
[...]
In order for this to be easy for users, I need to put the init streams
and set current stream functions into a package, and then streamline
the process of creating the seed array. My opinion is that CRAN is
now overflowed
Dirk - I'm having the same issue. Could you provide the details of your
solution?
On Sat, Jan 28, 2012 at 11:15 AM, Dirk Eddelbuettel e...@debian.org wrote:
On 28 January 2012 at 16:52, Uwe Ligges wrote:
|
|
| On 27.01.2012 15:57, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
|
| On 12 January 2012 at
10 matches
Mail list logo