On Jun 19, 2012, at 11:04 AM, andre zege wrote:
> I am reading into Java dput output for a matrix, more specifically for a
> file backed big-matrix. I basically need to lift dimnames for a matrix from
> dput output. It's no big deal, but the code is very 'hackish' due to the
> need to get rid of
On 20 June 2012 at 10:33, Simon Urbanek wrote:
|
| On Jun 19, 2012, at 11:04 AM, andre zege wrote:
|
| > I am reading into Java dput output for a matrix, more specifically for a
| > file backed big-matrix. I basically need to lift dimnames for a matrix from
| > dput output. It's no big deal, but
Hi all,
Any ideas about this? As far as I can tell it should work - and I
don't understand why it's ok when run outside of a package.
Hadley
On Wed, Jun 13, 2012 at 7:41 PM, Winston Chang wrote:
> I'm trying to overload an operator, and I'm running into a strange problem.
> It happens when I i
On 06/20/2012 07:25 PM, Hadley Wickham wrote:
Hi all,
Any ideas about this? As far as I can tell it should work - and I
don't understand why it's ok when run outside of a package.
from ?groupGeneric under 'Ops' (of which "+" is one)
used. If different methods are found, there is a
> from ?groupGeneric under 'Ops' (of which "+" is one)
>
> used. If different methods are found, there is a warning
> about 'incompatible methods': in that case or if no method is
> found for either argument the internal method is used.
>
> which doesn't really explain w
On 06/18/2012 01:01 AM, Janko Thyson wrote:
Dear list,
is there a way to declare public and private methods in S4 Reference
Classes? If not, are there plans to add such a feature?
Hi Janko -- your question is a little ambiguous; if it's about a
built-in facility to create public vs. private m
On 06/20/2012 08:06 PM, Hadley Wickham wrote:
from ?groupGeneric under 'Ops' (of which "+" is one)
used. If different methods are found, there is a warning
about 'incompatible methods': in that case or if no method is
found for either argument the internal method i
On Wed, Jun 20, 2012 at 10:49 PM, Martin Morgan wrote:
> On 06/20/2012 08:06 PM, Hadley Wickham wrote:
>
>> But aren't the methods compatible? If equality doesn't make a method
>> compatible what does?
>>
>
> Actually I guess that turns out to be the key (to why they work at the
> command line b
