Re: [Rd] R 2.15.2 still missing two files useful with the X11 icon patch

2012-10-26 Thread Philip Johnson
Glad to see this as well. Two notes on Dirk's comments: 1) As Dirk wrote, the changes in 2.15.2 apply to almost any X11 system (although, as the NEWS says, this change is particularly crucial with Ubuntu's new Unity interface). 2) The additional two files mentioned by Dirk are only usefu

Re: [Rd] R 2.15.2 make check failure on 32-bit --with-blas="-lgoto2"

2012-10-26 Thread Paul Gilbert
On 12-10-26 12:15 PM, Prof Brian Ripley wrote: On 26/10/2012 16:37, Paul Gilbert wrote: Is --with-blas="-lgoto2" a known problem (other than possibly not being the preferred choice)? And what precisely is it? And what chipset are you using? I thought I had been testing RC with the same se

Re: [Rd] R 2.15.2 make check failure on 32-bit --with-blas="-lgoto2"

2012-10-26 Thread Prof Brian Ripley
On 26/10/2012 16:37, Paul Gilbert wrote: Is --with-blas="-lgoto2" a known problem (other than possibly not being the preferred choice)? And what precisely is it? And what chipset are you using? I thought I had been testing RC with the same setup I regularly use, but I now see there was a sli

[Rd] R 2.15.2 make check failure on 32-bit --with-blas="-lgoto2"

2012-10-26 Thread Paul Gilbert
Is --with-blas="-lgoto2" a known problem (other than possibly not being the preferred choice)? I thought I had been testing RC with the same setup I regularly use, but I now see there was a slight difference. I am now getting the following failure in make check on 32-bit Ubuntu 12.04, config

[Rd] R 2.15.2 still missing two files useful with the X11 icon patch

2012-10-26 Thread Dirk Eddelbuettel
Congrats on getting 2.15.2 out on schedule. Debian builds have been uploaded. It is my understanding that Phil's patch for the X11 logo -- so promimently featured as the first item in the NEWS file for the release -- offers more when two extra files are supplied. I have supplied these for the De

Re: [Rd] suppress *specific* warnings?

2012-10-26 Thread Prof Brian Ripley
On 26/10/2012 12:04, peter dalgaard wrote: On Oct 26, 2012, at 11:17 , Martin Maechler wrote: Duncan Murdoch on Thu, 25 Oct 2012 06:51:25 -0400 writes: On 12-10-25 5:28 AM, Martin Maechler wrote: Sorry guys, for coming late, but *please* don't go there. I've been there years ago, and

Re: [Rd] suppress *specific* warnings?

2012-10-26 Thread peter dalgaard
On Oct 26, 2012, at 11:17 , Martin Maechler wrote: >> Duncan Murdoch >>on Thu, 25 Oct 2012 06:51:25 -0400 writes: > >> On 12-10-25 5:28 AM, Martin Maechler wrote: >>> Sorry guys, for coming late, >>> but *please* don't go there. >>> >>> I've been there years ago, >>> and found late

[Rd] Namespace Dependencies not required

2012-10-26 Thread Mayank Bansal
Hi, I am trying to build an R package so reading the manual on CRAN. I could figure out that using imports to load functions in your namespace would be the best bet to use in the Description file. After adding to the description file, I also added it to the namespace file. I added importFrom

Re: [Rd] suppress *specific* warnings?

2012-10-26 Thread Martin Maechler
> Duncan Murdoch > on Thu, 25 Oct 2012 06:51:25 -0400 writes: > On 12-10-25 5:28 AM, Martin Maechler wrote: >> Sorry guys, for coming late, >> but *please* don't go there. >> >> I've been there years ago, >> and found later why the approach is flawed "by desig