On Fri, May 17, 2013 at 8:22 AM, Steve Lianoglou
lianoglou.st...@gene.com wrote:
Hi,
On Friday, May 17, 2013, Dan Tenenbaum wrote:
On Thu, May 16, 2013 at 10:53 PM, Renaud Gaujoux
ren...@mancala.cbio.uct.ac.za wrote:
Hi,
I am trying to submit a package to Bioconductor with a Suggests
Thanks very much Dan -- and Steve.
I perfectly understand that setting _R_CHECK_FORCE_SUGGESTS_=false globally
is not really an option, and that checks must be as strict as possible. I
am fine with using the Enhances field, since it keeps the dependency. Will
fix the package and re-submit.
An
On 13-05-16 11:17 PM, Peter Meilstrup wrote:
On Thu, May 16, 2013 at 6:06 AM, McGehee, Robert
robert.mcge...@geodecapital.com wrote:
Duncan, Thank you for the clarification on how delayedAssign works. Should
R-level interfaces to promise objects ever become available, I expect they
would at
On Fri, May 17, 2013 at 2:47 AM, Duncan Murdoch murdoch.dun...@gmail.comwrote:
On 13-05-16 11:17 PM, Peter Meilstrup wrote:
On Thu, May 16, 2013 at 6:06 AM, McGehee, Robert
Robert.McGehee@geodecapital.**com robert.mcge...@geodecapital.com
wrote:
Duncan, Thank you for the clarification on
On May 16, 2013, at 15:06 , McGehee, Robert wrote:
Duncan, Thank you for the clarification on how delayedAssign works. Should
R-level interfaces to promise objects ever become available, I expect they
would at time come in handy.
On the subject of substitute and delayedAssign, I do have
Bill
I think you are correct, there's something funny in add1, but is it just
degrees of freedom? Example below..
On Tue, May 14, 2013 at 2:23 PM, William Dunlap wdun...@tibco.com wrote:
Shouldn't the F statistic (and p value) for the x2 term in the following
calls
to anova() and add1() be
Hello dear R-devel,
I am not sure if this issue is tracked or not, but in case it isn't:
It appears that R 3.0.1 reproduces the error reported for R 3.0.0 here:
http://r.789695.n4.nabble.com/R-3-0-0-wrong-MD5-checksums-for-Windows-td4663348.html
That is, that when installing R 3.0.1 on Windows
