Hi Duncan,
Again, thanks a lot for making this change (help requests are tried
over all loaded instead of attached packages):
https://github.com/wch/r-source/commit/21d2f7430b4 This makes what I
proposed last time possible now: if pkg B imports FUN from A and
re-exports it, ?FUN will work after B
Hi Duncan,
Thanks a lot for eventually implementing this and making the Rd world
greener! https://github.com/wch/r-source/commit/ff3ea81ae87
Regards,
Yihui
--
Yihui Xie
Web: http://yihui.name
On Wed, Oct 9, 2013 at 3:55 PM, Duncan Murdoch wrote:
> On 13-10-09 4:34 PM, Yihui Xie wrote:
>>
>> +
Hello,
What I meant was that the second rule implies that Depends packages should be
in the NAMESPACE file, but the first rule implies that packages in the
NAMESPACE file should not be in the Depends field, but Imports field. It would
be a logical contradiction if it wasn't preceded by "almost
> >> SEXP mkans(double x)
> >> {
> >> SEXP ans;
> >> ans = PROTECT(allocVector(REALSXP, 1));
> >> REAL(ans)[0] = x;
> >> UNPROTECT(1);
> >> return ans;
> >> }
> >One should also note that the PROTECT within mkans is unnecessary,
> >and must surely be confusing to anyone w
Thanks a lot . Appreciate your time . I am sorry for missing snippets of
the code , trying to copy back and forth . My bad .sorry for that .
The dataframe df is to be of VECSXP .
PROTECT(df = allocVector(VECSXP,2));
What I am trying to do ?
Lets say you read a huge table , with each column is d
On 06/27/2014 02:23 AM, Radford Neal wrote:
The code is actually not safe. Both "install" and "SalarLogical/Integer"
potentially allocate memory, so at least one needs to be protected before
callling lang3. (Passing one such argument would be OK, since lang3
protects its arguments, but it doesn
Dear all,
I am struggling to get the 'Rtools' tool chain to successfully build .dlls
using the "R CMD SHLIB" method on my home Win7 64-bit (Ultimate) PC.
Strangely I did get it working on my work PC (also Win7 64-bit but
Enterprise) so I am totally at a loss as to what to do.
When I type, "R CMD
dear developers
I myself am not a prog-devel, I found this
http://devgurus.amd.com/message/1255852#1255852
Most R compilations/installations I use seem to fail this
test, is this a problem and if yes then how serious is it?
regards
__
R-devel@r-pr
On 27.06.2014 04:00, Dario Strbenac wrote:
Hello,
The Writing R Extensions manual gives confusing advice. Compare
Packages listed in imports or importFrom directives in the NAMESPACE file
should almost always be in ‘Imports’ and not ‘Depends’.
with
Almost always packages mentioned in ‘Depe
> >The code is actually not safe. Both "install" and "SalarLogical/Integer"
> >potentially allocate memory, so at least one needs to be protected before
> >callling lang3. (Passing one such argument would be OK, since lang3
> >protects its arguments, but it doesn't get a chance to do that while t
On Fri, Jun 27, 2014 at 3:00 AM, Dario Strbenac
wrote:
> Hello,
>
> The Writing R Extensions manual gives confusing advice. Compare
>
> Packages listed in imports or importFrom directives in the NAMESPACE file
> should almost always be in ‘Imports’ and not ‘Depends’.
>
> with
>
> Almost always pa
11 matches
Mail list logo