Hi Pete,
Sorry for the delay.
On 02/10/2016 12:33 PM, Peter Hickey wrote:
The assays slot in a SummarizedExperiment object supports elements
with up to 4 dimensions [*]
library(SummarizedExperiment)
makeSE <- function(n) {
assay <- array(1:2^n,
What? `^` has precedence over `:` ?
On 24/02/2016 11:16 AM, Duncan Murdoch wrote:
On 24/02/2016 9:55 AM, Mikko Korpela wrote:
On 24.02.2016 15:47, Duncan Murdoch wrote:
On 23/02/2016 7:06 AM, Mikko Korpela wrote:
On 23.02.2016 11:37, Martin Maechler wrote:
nospam@altfeld-im de
on Mon, 22 Feb 2016
On Wed, Feb 24, 2016 at 10:40 AM, Suharto Anggono Suharto Anggono via
R-devel wrote:
> R help on 'strptime' has the following in "Details" section.
> Specific to R is ‘%OSn’, which for output gives the seconds truncated to ‘0
> <= n <= 6’ decimal places (and if ‘%OS’ is
R help on 'strptime' has the following in "Details" section.
Specific to R is ‘%OSn’, which for output gives the seconds truncated to ‘0 <=
n <= 6’ decimal places (and if ‘%OS’ is not followed by a digit, it uses the
setting of ‘getOption("digits.secs")’, or if that is unset, ‘n = 3’).
In
On 24/02/2016 9:55 AM, Mikko Korpela wrote:
On 24.02.2016 15:47, Duncan Murdoch wrote:
On 23/02/2016 7:06 AM, Mikko Korpela wrote:
On 23.02.2016 11:37, Martin Maechler wrote:
nospam@altfeld-im de
on Mon, 22 Feb 2016 18:45:59 +0100 writes:
> Dear R
A news entry for R 3.2.3 patched:
pretty(D) for date-time objects D now also works well if range(D) is (much)
smaller than a second. In the case of only one unique value in D, the pretty
range now is more symmetric around that value than previously.
Similarly, pretty(dt) no longer returns a
On 24.02.2016 15:47, Duncan Murdoch wrote:
> On 23/02/2016 7:06 AM, Mikko Korpela wrote:
>> On 23.02.2016 11:37, Martin Maechler wrote:
nospam@altfeld-im de
on Mon, 22 Feb 2016 18:45:59 +0100 writes:
>>>
>>> > Dear R developers
>>> > I think
On 23/02/2016 7:06 AM, Mikko Korpela wrote:
On 23.02.2016 11:37, Martin Maechler wrote:
nospam@altfeld-im de
on Mon, 22 Feb 2016 18:45:59 +0100 writes:
> Dear R developers
> I think I have found a bug that can be reproduced with two lines of code
>