Re: [Rd] RProfmem output format

2016-06-04 Thread Henrik Bengtsson
I'm picking up this 5-year old thread. 1. About the four memory allocations without a stacktrace I think the four memory allocations without a stacktrace reported by Rprofmem(): > Rprofmem(); x <- raw(2000); Rprofmem("") > cat(readLines("Rprofmem.out", n=5, warn=FALSE), sep="\n") 192 :360 :360 :

[Rd] factors with non-unique ("duplicated") levels have been deprecated since 2009 -- are *more* deprecated now -- and why you should be hesitant misusing suppressWarnings()

2016-06-04 Thread Martin Maechler
>From this bug report (it's a proposal for speedup only, not a bug), https://bugs.r-project.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16895#c6 the fact that you can construct factors with non-unique aka "duplicated" levels in R has been re-raised. As mentioned there, we had a small discussion here (on 'R-d

Re: [Rd] Submitting an updated package version to CRAN (Warning: non-ASCII characters)

2016-06-04 Thread Luck Buttered
Thank you, Prof Brian Ripley. That is a helpful resource! Since my only non-ASCII characters are in an example data frame, I think I will use the iconv() function to convert that example data frame into UTF-8. Then, I will indicate that R version >=2.10 must be in the Depends field of the DESCRIPT