Re: [Rd] surprisingly, S4 classes with a "dim" or "dimnames" slot are final (in the Java sense)

Thanks Michael for taking care of this. H. On 06/06/2017 11:48 AM, Michael Lawrence wrote: I've fixed this and will commit soon. Disregard my dim<-() example; that behaves as expected (the class needs a dim<-() method). Michael On Tue, Jun 6, 2017 at 5:16 AM, Michael Lawrence

[Bioc-devel] Invitation à rejoindre GDG Buea

GDG Buea Rejoignez Delveri Chick et 6 autres Members à Buea. Soyez le premier à être informé des prochains Meetups. The Google Developer Group Buea (GDG Buea) is a #techosystem of electronic enthusiasts and technically-minded hobbyists which grooms programmers, entrepreneurs and researchers

[Rd] Philosophy behind converting Fortran to C for use in R

Hello. This is not a question about a bug or even best practices; rather I'm trying to understand the philosophy or theory as to why certain portions of the R codebase are written as they are. If this question is better posed elsewhere, please point me in the proper direction. In the thread

Re: [Rd] Usage of PROTECT_WITH_INDEX in R-exts

On 06.06.2017 10:07, Martin Maechler wrote: Kirill Müller on Mon, 5 Jun 2017 17:30:20 +0200 writes: > Hi I've noted a minor inconsistency in the documentation: > Current R-exts reads > s = PROTECT_WITH_INDEX(eval(OS->R_fcall, OS->R_env),

Re: [Rd] surprisingly, S4 classes with a "dim" or "dimnames" slot are final (in the Java sense)

I've fixed this and will commit soon. Disregard my dim<-() example; that behaves as expected (the class needs a dim<-() method). Michael On Tue, Jun 6, 2017 at 5:16 AM, Michael Lawrence wrote: > Thanks for the report. The issue is that one cannot set special attributes >

Re: [Rd] Unexpected interaction between missing() and a blank expression

> On 6 Jun 2017, at 18:50 , Hong Ooi via R-devel wrote: > > This is something I came across just now: > > f <- function(x) missing(x) > z <- quote(expr=) > > f(z) > # TRUE > > The object z contains the equivalent of a missing function argument. Another > method for

[Rd] Unexpected interaction between missing() and a blank expression

This is something I came across just now: f <- function(x) missing(x) z <- quote(expr=) f(z) # TRUE The object z contains the equivalent of a missing function argument. Another method for generating a missing arg would be alist(a=)$a . Should f(z) return TRUE in this case? I interpret

Re: [Rd] [bug] droplevels() also drop object attributes (comment…)

> Martin Maechler > on Tue, 16 May 2017 11:01:23 +0200 writes: > Serge Bibauw > on Mon, 15 May 2017 11:59:32 -0400 writes: >> Hi, >> Just reporting a small bug… not really a big deal, but I >> don’t think that

Re: [Rd] surprisingly, S4 classes with a "dim" or "dimnames" slot are final (in the Java sense)

Thanks for the report. The issue is that one cannot set special attributes like names, dim, dimnames, etc on S4 objects. I was aready working on this and will have a fix soon. > a2 <- new("A2") > dim(a2) <- c(2, 3) Error in dim(a2) <- c(2, 3) : invalid first argument On Mon, Jun 5, 2017 at 6:08

Re: [Rd] Usage of PROTECT_WITH_INDEX in R-exts

> Kirill Müller > on Mon, 5 Jun 2017 17:30:20 +0200 writes: > Hi I've noted a minor inconsistency in the documentation: > Current R-exts reads > s = PROTECT_WITH_INDEX(eval(OS->R_fcall, OS->R_env), ); > but I believe it has to be