On 04/19/2018 02:06 AM, Duncan Murdoch wrote:
On 18/04/2018 5:08 PM, Tousey, Colton wrote:
Hello,
I want to report a bug in R that is limiting my capabilities to
export a matrix with write.csv or write.table with over 2,147,483,648
elements (C's int limit). I found this bug already reported a
> Michael Lawrence
> on Wed, 18 Apr 2018 14:16:37 -0700 writes:
> Hi Bill,
> Ideally, your coworker would just make an alias (or shortcut or
> whatever) for R that passed --no-save to R. I'll try to look into this
> though.
> Michael
Yes, indeed!
As some of you
Le 19/04/2018 à 09:30, Tomas Kalibera a écrit :
On 04/19/2018 02:06 AM, Duncan Murdoch wrote:
On 18/04/2018 5:08 PM, Tousey, Colton wrote:
Hello,
I want to report a bug in R that is limiting my capabilities to
export a matrix with write.csv or write.table with over
2,147,483,648 elements (C'
On 04/19/2018 11:47 AM, Serguei Sokol wrote:
Le 19/04/2018 à 09:30, Tomas Kalibera a écrit :
On 04/19/2018 02:06 AM, Duncan Murdoch wrote:
On 18/04/2018 5:08 PM, Tousey, Colton wrote:
Hello,
I want to report a bug in R that is limiting my capabilities to
export a matrix with write.csv or wri
Le 19/04/2018 à 12:15, Tomas Kalibera a écrit :
On 04/19/2018 11:47 AM, Serguei Sokol wrote:
replace
tmp = EncodeElement2(x, i + j*nr, quote_col[j], qmethod,
&strBuf, sdec);
by
tmp = EncodeElement2(VECTOR_ELT(x, (R_xlen_t)i + j*nr), 0,
quote_col[j], qmethod,
> Serguei Sokol
> on Thu, 19 Apr 2018 13:29:54 +0200 writes:
[...]
> Thanks Tomas for this detailed explanation.
> I would like also to signal a problem with the list. It must be
> corrupted in some way because beside the Tomas' response I've got five
The problem is not specific to redefining the q function, but to
the interaction of assignInNamespace and setGeneric. The
latter requires, roughtly, that the environment of the function
being replaced by an S4 generic is (or is the descendent of)
the environment in which it lives.
E.g., the follo
On 2018-04-19 09:40, Martin Maechler wrote:
Serguei Sokol
on Thu, 19 Apr 2018 13:29:54 +0200 writes:
[...]
> Thanks Tomas for this detailed explanation.
> I would like also to signal a problem with the list. It must be
> corrupted in some way because beside
To clarify, I am going to fix the issue in the methods package
(actually I already have but need to test further). There's no intent
to change the behavior of q().
On Thu, Apr 19, 2018 at 8:39 AM, William Dunlap wrote:
> The problem is not specific to redefining the q function, but to
> the inter
