Hi
I've submitted a new package (issues #774) on that day (14/06) and it still
doesn't have any label such as 1. awaiting moderation. Just wondering if it
was this problem, or something I've done wrong with the submission. Thanks for
your help.
Hien
From:
Hi Jen,
Please provide a reproducible example, since the original stack
overflow example works in both trunk and patched.
Thanks,
Michael
On Tue, Jun 19, 2018 at 3:45 PM, Jennifer Lyon
wrote:
> Hi Michael:
>
> I can confirm Martin's comment. I tested my software with r-devel (r74914)
> and it
Thomas Levine writes:
> I have yet to find any example of my proposed changes causing a
> regression. I believe that the most reasonable thing that it might
> break is something that depends on either kruskal.test raising an
> error or that depends on the specific text in the error message.
>
> If
Thomas Levine writes:
> I submit a couple options for addressing bug 16719: kruskal.test
> documentation for formula.
> https://bugs.r-project.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=16719
>
> disallow-character.diff changes the documentation and error message
> to indicate that factors are accepted.
>
>
Hi Michael:
I can confirm Martin's comment. I tested my software with r-devel (r74914)
and it works, while with r-patched (r74914) it does not work (it hangs, as
it did in R 3.5.0). I apologize for it taking so long for me to test this,
but is there any chance this fix could make into R 3.5.1?
In R, family has aic component since version 0.62. There is no aic component in
family in R 0.61.3.
Looking at blame,
https://github.com/wch/r-source/blame/tags/R-0-62/src/library/base/R/family.R ,
aic component in family is introduced in svn revision 640
> Kolter, Andreas writes:
> Sorry, I don't understand how to file a bug properly. Nontheless I
> want to report this one because it is still in the code after so many
> years.
Thanks. This is now fixed in the trunk with c74916.
Best
-k
> This bug still exists:
>
