I'm not really the one who makes these decisions; I'd just wait for
someone on the Core team to reply to this thread. Maybe they are all
just busy right now.
On Mon, Apr 29, 2019 at 10:08:43PM -0400, Joshua N Pritikin wrote:
On Mon, Apr 29, 2019 at 06:28:46PM -0700, frede...@ofb.net wrote:
I th
On Mon, Apr 29, 2019 at 06:28:46PM -0700, frede...@ofb.net wrote:
> I think this is a good idea. Is there a reason why it got no interest?
> Slippery slope?
What's the next step? Can it get committed?
> Or maybe others were also just occupied trying to figure out how
> Joshua's second message had
I think this is a good idea. Is there a reason why it got no interest?
Slippery slope?
Or maybe others were also just occupied trying to figure out how
Joshua's second message had timestamp earlier than his first message?
On Fri, Apr 05, 2019 at 12:05:36PM -0400, Joshua N Pritikin wrote:
With t
> Duncan Murdoch
> on Sat, 27 Apr 2019 15:00:20 -0400 writes:
> On 27/04/2019 2:46 p.m., Duncan Murdoch wrote:
>> On 27/04/2019 10:30 a.m., Len Weil wrote:
>>> Gentlemen,
>>>
>>> I've observed a suspected bug in R-3.60 for Windows 10.
>>>
>>> I am using t
