Re: [Rd] Rf_defineVar(symbol, R_UnboundValue, environment) questions

2019-09-03 Thread Tomas Kalibera
Thanks for spotting this pattern. Using Rf_defineVar() this way to delete a variable from package code is wrong because WRE does not describe such behavior. That behavior has not been intended by the implementation and as you observe, the variable will not be properly deleted. I found another

[Rd] reverse dependency checks

2019-09-03 Thread Therneau, Terry M., Ph.D. via R-devel
I remember there was advice about a server that one could use for reverse dependency checks, but I forgot to write it down.  (Or I did save the info and forgot where I saved it...)   I have been doing the checks for survival myself, but the count is getting out of hand (663, not counting bioc

[Rd] possible bug in R's configure check for C++11 features

2019-09-03 Thread Kasper Daniel Hansen
I am trying to compile R under a new setup, and frankly, I have had a lot of problems, but I think the stuff below points to a possible bug in R's (custom) configure checks for C++11/14/17, but not for C++98. This is a report about R from the R-3-6 branch, with a svn checkout from today, revision

Re: [Rd] possible bug in R's configure check for C++11 features

2019-09-03 Thread Simon Urbanek
Kasper, I haven’t checked in depth, so just to clarify: you *are* setting CXX11=g++ so it is doing what you asked it to. Since the settings are inherited upwards, this implies that you are setting both CXX14 and CXX17 to g++. So I’m not quite sure I understand your concern. Cheers, Simon >