Hi Michael,
At the risk of sounding like I'm just name-dropping, R. Gentleman once told
me something along the lines of "version numbers are cheap, don't be afrai
to use a lot of them".
I get that its a bit annoying but its for good reason, imho. Any change, no
matter how trivial will change the
On Wed, 8 Jan 2020, Iñaki Ucar wrote:
On Wed, 8 Jan 2020 at 19:21, Toby Hocking wrote:
Hi R-core, I was wondering if somebody could please add jsslogo.jpg to the
R sources? (as I reported yesterday in this bug)
https://bugs.r-project.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17687
R already includes jss
On Wed, 8 Jan 2020 at 19:21, Toby Hocking wrote:
>
> Hi R-core, I was wondering if somebody could please add jsslogo.jpg to the
> R sources? (as I reported yesterday in this bug)
>
> https://bugs.r-project.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17687
>
> R already includes jss.cls which is the document clas
Hi R-core, I was wondering if somebody could please add jsslogo.jpg to the
R sources? (as I reported yesterday in this bug)
https://bugs.r-project.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17687
R already includes jss.cls which is the document class file for Journal of
Statistical Software. Actually, for the
On 8 January 2020 at 10:06, Michael Friendly wrote:
| It used to be the case that when I submitted a package and it gave notes
| or warnings in the CRAN checks, I was required to bump the package
| version before re-submission.
|
| I hope this is no longer the case. I recently submitted a pac
It used to be the case that when I submitted a package and it gave notes
or warnings in the CRAN checks, I was required to bump the package
version before re-submission.
I hope this is no longer the case. I recently submitted a package that
gave one fairly trivial NOTE, fixed that, and would
> Henrik Bengtsson
> on Tue, 7 Jan 2020 13:31:18 -0800 writes:
> On Tue, Jan 7, 2020 at 6:14 AM brodie gaslam via R-devel
> wrote:
>>
>> For whatever my 2c are worth I think this would be nice. I'm still
uncomfortable at having to call `options` in my package `diff
