> On Mar 6, 2020, at 9:17 AM, brodie gaslam via R-devel
> wrote:
>
>> On Friday, March 6, 2020, 8:56:54 AM EST, Martin Maechler
>> wrote:
>
>> Note that the * -> LaTex -> PDF rendered version looks a bitnicer.
>
> Ah yes, that does indeed look quite a bit nicer.
>
>> I wrote the functio
> On Friday, March 6, 2020, 8:56:54 AM EST, Martin Maechler
> wrote:
> Note that the * -> LaTex -> PDF rendered version looks a bitnicer.
Ah yes, that does indeed look quite a bit nicer.
> I wrote the function and that help page originally.
And thank you for doing so. It is a wonderful fu
> brodie gaslam via R-devel
> on Thu, 5 Mar 2020 22:18:33 + (UTC) writes:
> I've found over time that R documentation that comes off as terse at
> first blush is usually revealed to be precise, concise, and complete
> on close reading. I'm sure this is also true of `?
On 3/5/20 5:39 PM, Therneau, Terry M., Ph.D. via R-devel wrote:
I ended up finding the issue by a focused code review.
Once in the past, I had a version that would fail under one architecture but
not another,
in that case some help from Brian Ripley pointed me to the offending line of C
cod
