The field has been removed in R 3.4.0 after being deprecated in R
3.3.3. Indeed, the paragraph describing it has been commented out
(lines 10144-10151 in R-exts.texi), but another paragraph above (lines
10101-10110) still mentions the field as if it exists. I would like to
suggest some rewording al
Also, just came to know about dotcall64::.C64() (on CRAN) which allows
for Fortran to be called using .Call().
-Naras
On 12/23/20 8:34 AM, Balasubramanian Narasimhan wrote:
I think it should be pretty easy to fix up SUtools to use the .Call
instead of .Fortran following along the lines of
ht
To me it seems like returning chi-sq = 0 and p-value = 1 would make sense.
It would also be consistent with other scenarios of equal variance in all
groups. One example:
fligner.test(1:8, gl(2,4))
#Fligner-Killeen test of homogeneity of variances
#
# data: 1:8 and gl(2, 4)
# Fligner-Kille
> Balasubramanian Narasimhan
> on Wed, 23 Dec 2020 08:34:40 -0800 writes:
> I think it should be pretty easy to fix up SUtools to use the .Call
> instead of .Fortran following along the lines of
> https://github.com/wrathematics/Romp
> I too deal with a lot of f77 a
On 2020-12-19 18:04, Koenker, Roger W wrote:
There are comments in various places, including R-extensions §5.4 suggesting
that .Fortran is (nearly)
deprecated
This scares me somewhat: Where in §5.4 do you find that suggestion? My
package eha is built upon a stand-alone Fortran 77 program
Hi.
I haven't tested the speed of the old .Fortran interface, but in this
post [1] I describe how to build a simple interface (there are two
small packages on github that correspond to the code) and in this one
[2] I compare the speed of the different languages, but all using
.Call.
Hope that hel
I think it should be pretty easy to fix up SUtools to use the .Call
instead of .Fortran following along the lines of
https://github.com/wrathematics/Romp
I too deal with a lot of f77 and so I will most likely finish it before
the new year, if not earlier. (Would welcome testers besides myself.
Thanks to all and best wishes for a better 2021.
Unfortunately I remain somewhat confused:
o Bill reveals an elegant way to get from my rudimentary registration
setup to
one that would explicitly type the C interface functions,
o Ivan seems to suggest that there would
Dear Luke,
Thank you, this makes perfect sense.
I find it quite hard to express this issue in a way that is both compact
and understandable.
In any case, below you find a proposal for an update of the documentation.
Thank you again for all your work,
Mark
Index: src/library/parallel/man/clust
