On 12/18/23 16:41, Jisca Huisman wrote:
Hello Ivan & Tomas,
Thank you for your time and helpful suggestions!
The finer details of memory use and heap vs stack are still outside my
comfort zone, but some trial and error shows that using an allocatable
does indeed solve the issue. When using
Hello Ivan & Tomas,
Thank you for your time and helpful suggestions!
The finer details of memory use and heap vs stack are still outside my
comfort zone, but some trial and error shows that using an allocatable
does indeed solve the issue. When using the largest value I expect users
to use
On 12/18/23 15:09, Ivan Krylov wrote:
В Mon, 18 Dec 2023 11:06:16 +0100
Jisca Huisman пишет:
I isolated the problem in a minimal working example available here:
https://github.com/JiscaH/flang_segfault_min_example . All that does
is pass a vector of length N*N back and forth between R and
В Mon, 18 Dec 2023 11:06:16 +0100
Jisca Huisman пишет:
> I isolated the problem in a minimal working example available here:
> https://github.com/JiscaH/flang_segfault_min_example . All that does
> is pass a vector of length N*N back and forth between R and Fortran.
> It works fine for very
Does mFUN() really need to be a function of x and the NA values of x? I
can't think of a case where it would be used on anything but the non-NA
values of x.
I think it would be easier to specify a different mFUN() (and document this
new argument) if the function has one argument and is applied to
Hello,
My package sequoia contains Fortran code, and failed to pass the
pre-test on Debian with the new flang-new compiler. I was able to
reproduce the issue, but strongly suspect it is an issue with
flang-new-17 rather than with my code. However, since in the past when I
thought the problem
Le 18/12/2023 à 11:24, Martin Maechler a écrit :
Serguei Sokol via R-devel
on Mon, 18 Dec 2023 10:29:02 +0100 writes:
> Le 17/12/2023 à 18:26, Barry Rowlingson a écrit :
>> I think what's been missed is that zapsmall works relative to the
absolute
>> largest value in the
> Serguei Sokol via R-devel
> on Mon, 18 Dec 2023 10:29:02 +0100 writes:
> Le 17/12/2023 à 18:26, Barry Rowlingson a écrit :
>> I think what's been missed is that zapsmall works relative to the
absolute
>> largest value in the vector. Hence if there's only one
>>
Le 17/12/2023 à 18:26, Barry Rowlingson a écrit :
I think what's been missed is that zapsmall works relative to the absolute
largest value in the vector. Hence if there's only one
item in the vector, it is the largest, so its not zapped. The function's
raison d'etre isn't to replace absolutely
On Sun, 17 Dec 2023 21:48:51 +0200
Christiaan Pieterse wrote:
> Warning in complexity_measures(Mbin, method = "reflections",
> iterations = iterCompl) :
> 'iterations' was changed to 'iterations + 1' to work with an even
> number of iterations
> Killed
If this is happening on Linux, this
10 matches
Mail list logo
