Hi,
I'm changing my name and my email address. I've got an update I'd like to
submit to CRAN, I've changed my name and email in my DESCRIPTION.
I couldn't find any details about changing maintainers in the R manuals
unfortunately. Someone online said to just submit the update, CRAN will
send
I'm not very familiar with Roxygen, so I might be making incorrect
assumptions here.
Why are you exporting a function if it's meant to be internal?
And the @noRd would indicate that a documentation file is not created. I
would remove @noRd or @export
On Fri, Feb 24, 2023, 16:11 EcoC2S - Irucka
Rd documentation is latex like, so comments can be included with a percent
symbol. You should write \% if you intend to write a literal percent
symbol.
On Wed, Jan 18, 2023, 23:00 mai zhou wrote:
> Hi,
>
> In the process of adding examples to the .RD file, I noticed
> Rcmd check seems to skip
Here's another suggestion, not sure if it's any good, but you could
structure your functions like
parse_args <- function (envir = parent.frame())
{
evalq(list(a = a, b = b, ..., y = y, z = z), envir)
<...>
}
exported_fun <- function (a, b, ..., y, z)
{
parse_args()
<...>
}
It's
You can declare degree_C as a variable before using set_units():
degree_C <- NULL
set_units(T, degree_C)
you could use globalVariables() somewhere at the top-level in your package:
utils::globalVariables("degree_C")
or you could supply degree_C as a literal character string:
set_units(T,
Packages in Suggests and Enhances do not create a circular dependency, only
the packages in the Depends and Imports need to be installed at INSTALL and
loaded at load time. Packages in Suggests and Enhances are only needed at
check time, and even then it's more of a desire to be loaded than
Hi everyone,
I had some R code for dealing with connections, and I was using
summary.connection(). I rewrote it in C, so I was doing something more
like:
#include
Rconnection Rcon = R_GetConnection(file);
Rcon->description or Rcon->class
but now, when checking my package, I get the following
The capital does not matter for CRAN, packages may not be published if an
existing package exists by the same name, regardless of case.
Plus, the package at https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=AQLSchemes says the
maintainer is John Lawson
On Tue, Oct 25, 2022, 17:53 Rolf Turner wrote:
> On
You could install VirtualBox if you wanted to test it yourself, or if you
have the tarball available online somewhere, I can try building it.
On Wed., Oct. 19, 2022, 19:57 Vincent Plagnol,
wrote:
> Dear all at R-package-devel,
>
> I am struggling with a R package build.
> It builds fine on my
This issue isn't related to RStudio.
The issue is that you're exporting an object without providing any
documentation for it. It sounds like you don't want to export it, so you
need to go to your NAMESPACE file and remove the part was export(r2). If
you do want to export it, then you need to
Hello,
This isn't something that can be fixed in the parser. If an argument isn't
provided, its default value is evaluated inside the function, so it gives
you a loop where schema = schema(x), but then what's schema, it's
schema(x), thus the recursion error. you could do something like this:
>From the line `function(A, B) standardGeneric("SetOfParams")`, A and B will
always have default values of R_MissingArg
Providing default values within the methods does nothing since A and B have
already been initialized before arriving at the method.
You could do something like:
if (missing(A))
appearance, they have nearly equivalent functionality and performance.
On Thu, Oct 21, 2021 at 2:45 AM Rolf Turner wrote:
>
> On Thu, 21 Oct 2021 02:03:41 -0400
> Duncan Murdoch wrote:
>
> > On 21/10/2021 12:40 a.m., Andrew Simmons wrote:
> > > I think the simplest answer i
I think the simplest answer is to store the variable in the functions
frame. I'm assuming here that the only plot.foo needs access to .fooInfo,
if not this can be changed.
plot.foo <- function (...)
{
.fooInfo
}
environment(plot.foo) <- new.env()
evalq({
.fooInfo <- NULL
},
command prompt, or via
> cygwin, or in the console window of RStudio?
> >>
> >> This seems unstable to me.
> >
> >Sorry, too much context missing. What's unstable?
> >
> >Duncan Murdoch
> >
> >>
> >> On September 30, 2021 11:52:16
Hello,
I'm updating my package 'this.path' which is supposed to retrieve the
absolute path of the executing script when called. It's similar to 'here',
except that 'here' constructs paths relative to a project directory,
whereas 'this.path' constructs paths relative to script directories. I was
I noticed in the Writing R Extensions manual, it says that within a
NAMESPACE file, "Only very simple conditional processing of if statements
is implemented.".
I tried it out myself by importing a Windows exclusive function:
if (.Platform$OS.type == "windows")
importFrom(utils,
Hello,
@Martin Maechler:
%until% and %while% use R's builtin repeat function. Something like
do(expr) %until% (cond)
repeat {
expr
if (cond)
break
}
are identical. After %until% and %while% check the arguments look correct,
it makes a call to repeat like above and evaluates it
usage documentation to have it look like
do(expr) %while% (cond)
If it helps at all with context, I'll provide the R and C scripts I'm using.
On Tue, Aug 10, 2021 at 11:47 PM Hugh Parsonage
wrote:
> What is the behaviour of %while% if not preceded by an expression wrapped
> in do() ?
&
Hello,
I've written two functions to emulate do while/until loops seen in other
languages, but I'm having trouble documenting its usage. The function is
typically used like:
do ({
expr1
expr2
...
}) %while% (cond)
so I want to document it something like:
do(expr) %while% (cond)
incompatible when sourcing URLs
* return the URL from that source call
Any help is greatly appreciated, thank you!
Regards,
Andrew Simmons
[[alternative HTML version deleted]]
__
R-package-devel@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.c
Hello,
I've been trying to translate some of my slow R code into C code, and I
need the complex math functions to be able to do this. I assumed I could
access them with
#include
but it seems as though that file only contains the definition of structure
Rcomplex. Any help accessing these
22 matches
Mail list logo
