rewall has blocked this app", or something
like that -- where you can allow access. As long as this window is
open, the command prompt is not returned.
Henric Winell
P.S. This topic is probably not appropriate for R-devel and follow-ups
should likely be directed to R-help instead. D.S.
(Let's keep the discussion on-list -- I've added back R-devel.)
On 2017-04-12 16:39, Ulrich Windl wrote:
Henric Winell schrieb am 12.04.2017
um 15:35 in
Nachricht :
On 2017-04-12 14:40, Ulrich Windl wrote:
The last line of the example in droplevels' manual page seems to
be
t;factor". So, your being amazed is a bit
surprising given that 'aq' is a data frame.
Henric Winell
aq <- transform(airquality, Month = factor(Month, labels =
month.abb[5:9])) aq <- subset(aq, Month != "Jul") table(aq$Month)
May Jun Jul Aug Sep 31 30 0 31 3
e Rtools installer.
After switching to the 64-bit versions, the use of registration now
seems to be reliably detected.
Henric Winell
__
R-devel@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel
On 2017-02-07 15:59, Martin Maechler wrote:
Henric Winell
on Tue, 7 Feb 2017 13:37:42 +0100 writes:
> Hi, On 2017-02-07 13:12, Benjamin Tyner wrote:
>> Hello
>>
>> When loading a package, I'm wondering if it's frowned
>> up
base R? Either something very general like
preserveRNGstate(library(parallel))
or perhaps an specific enhancement to library itself?
I would very much welcome a change, but in the light of things it
doesn't seem likely.
Henric Winell
Regards
Ben
g *source* package 'inum' ...
** R
** preparing package for lazy loading
** help
*** installing help indices
** building package indices
** testing if installed package can be loaded
*** arch - i386
*** arch - x64
* DONE (inum)
Is this a known issue? Or is it just me...?
Henric Winell
__
R-devel@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel
Den 2016-03-25 kl. 14:20, skrev Therneau, Terry M., Ph.D.:
The survival package has a firstlib.R file that I had forgotton and just
reviewed. After deleting several bits which had a use 10 years ago
during my Splus to R transition, the only thing remaining is
.onUnload <- function(libpath)
(1, 1, 2, 3)
> rank2(x, ties.method = "last")
[1] 1 2 4 3
That doesn't look right to me -- I had expected
> rev(sort.list(x, decreasing = TRUE))
[1] 2 1 3 4
Indeed, well spotted, that seems to be correct.
Henric Winell
--
In the particula
r have (Marius Hofert and I) overlooked something obvious ?
I think so: the code above doesn't seem to do the right thing. Consider
the following example:
> x <- c(1, 1, 2, 3)
> rank2(x, ties.method = "last")
[1] 1 2 4 3
That doesn't look right to me -- I had expected
&g
On 2015-01-08 02:31, Duncan Murdoch wrote:
On 07/01/2015 5:20 PM, Jeroen Ooms wrote:
On Wed, Jan 7, 2015 at 8:00 AM, Duncan Murdoch wrote:
This version includes only minor updates to the tools. I indicated last summer
that I was hoping to update GCC from the current version 4.6.3 before th
On 2015-01-08 14:18, Avraham Adler wrote:
Very timely, as this is how I got into the problem I posted about
earlier; maybe some of the problems I ran into will mean more to the
you and the experts on this thread, Dr. Murdoch.For reference, I run
Windows 7 64bit, and I am trying to build a 64 bit
Simon Urbanek skrev 2014-05-29 15:06:
Dario,
yes, that is a bug, now fixed.
Thanks for fixing it.
This problem was independently reported some time ago
(https://bugs.r-project.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15016) and I
believe that it can now be closed.
Henric
Cheers,
Simon
On May 29
Dear Prof Ripley,
Thank you for your kind reply. Please find my comments below.
On 2014-03-06 13:29, Prof Brian Ripley wrote:
On 06/03/2014 10:17, Henric Winell wrote:
Hi,
I've implemented parallelization in one of my packages using the
'parallel' package -- many thanks f
Comments below.
On 2014-03-06 11:17, Henric Winell wrote:
Hi,
I've implemented parallelization in one of my packages using the
'parallel' package -- many thanks for providing it!
In my package I'm importing 'parallel' and so added it to the
DESCRIPTION file&#x
somehow be avoided?
The current state of affairs is a bit unfortunate, since it implies that
a user just by loading the new parallelized version of my package can no
longer reproduce any subsequent results depending on random number
generation (unless a call to 'set.seed' was issued *after
16 matches
Mail list logo
