Because functions get called and therefore, the calling sequence matters. It’s
just protecting you from yourself, but as someone pointed out, there’s a way to
silence such notes.
G
From: Hervé Pagès
Sent: Tuesday, February 6, 2024 2:40 PM
To: Izmirlian, Grant (NIH/NCI) [E] ; Duncan Murdoch
The note refers to the fact that the function named ‘fun’ appears to be defined
in two different ways.
From: Hervé Pagès
Sent: Tuesday, February 6, 2024 2:17 PM
To: Duncan Murdoch ; Izmirlian, Grant (NIH/NCI) [E]
; r-devel@r-project.org
Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: [Rd] NOTE: multiple local
024, 10:44 AM
To: "Izmirlian, Grant (NIH/NCI) [E]"
Subject: Fwd: [EXTERNAL] R-devel Digest, Vol 252, Issue 2
Hi,
I just ran into this 'R CMD check' NOTE for the first time:
* checking R code for possible problems ... NOTE
toto: multiple local function definitions for �fun� with diffe
Hi R package developers. This is literally the strangest thing I've ever seen.
Latest (as of a month ago) R under cygwin64. I'm teaching an intern package
building and using the .C interface. The package compiles, but when it gets
to "setting up lazy load" or some such it throws the error
I'm fairly astute at C and R but new to parallelization. Would someone
be willing to provide help in the form of a simple example that parallelizes
an R function from the inside of a C routine?
If so, write me back at [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Thanks!
__
Hello R-devel:
This is an update on my R package, woods that does bagged classification trees
using data structures in C. Most of the comments of my earlier post still
apply, with some additions (noted *)
(i) fits a single classification tree to dataset (R function CT)
(ii) basic
Jim:
This reminds me of problems I've had before, but usually they occur when I quit
R
i.e. q(), because when testing and developing I can't remember actually
detaching
a package. I can however think of countless times I get a segmentation fault
upon
quiting R. Usually this boils down to a
Hello Hin-Tak:
Thanks for your interest. This is just a short not to tell you and others that
the URL idea is a good one. This will take a few days at our organization.
When its available I will post again to this thread. In the meantime, I will
will send copies directly to those interested. So