anks,
> Michael
>
>
>
> On Thu, Jun 16, 2016 at 1:42 AM, Jan Górecki wrote:
> > Dear Joris,
> >
> > So it does looks like the proposed function makes a lot sense then,
> isn't it?
> >
> > Cheers,
> > Jan
> >
> > On 16 June 2016 at
d R dependent, so devtools has to be too
> according to my understanding.
>
> Cheers
> Joris
>
> On 14 Jun 2016 18:56, "Jan Górecki" wrote:
>
> Hi Thierry,
>
> I'm perfectly aware of it. Any idea when devtools would be shipped as
> a base R package,
mortem examination: he may be able to say what
> the experiment died of. ~ Sir Ronald Aylmer Fisher
> The plural of anecdote is not data. ~ Roger Brinner
> The combination of some data and an aching desire for an answer does not
> ensure that a reasonable answer can be extracted from a given
Hi all,
Packages tools and utils have a lot of useful stuff for R developers.
I find one task still not as straightforward as it could. Simply to
extract dependencies of a package from DESCRIPTION file (before it is
even installed to library). This would be valuable in automation of CI
setup in a
Hello dear dev team,
In the recent devel R-exts manual I cannot find any information about new
option `--ignore-vignettes` to `R CMD check`. I would expect it to be
mentioned somewhere in "1.4.2 Non-Sweave vignettes".
Checked on https://cran.r-project.org/doc/manuals/r-devel/R-exts.html and
https
ow) you /could/ force R CMD check to
> do this now with a combination of options, though, if that's really what you
> want (which would allow your package to pass when _R_CHECK_FORCE_SUGGESTS_
> is set to false).
>
> ~G
>
> On Mon, Apr 4, 2016 at 7:25 AM, Hadley Wickham
Dear R team,
Are suggested dependencies mandatory in context of `R CMD check` when
using env var `_R_CHECK_FORCE_SUGGESTS_=FALSE`?
Suggested dependencies are nice because are optional.
But that feature often isn't valid when trying to run `R CMD check` on them.
I would like to use `export _R_CHEC
