Re: [Rd] sort changes datatype of operand (PR#9121)

2006-08-03 Thread Ponzio, Stephen [CIB-LAVA]
Is this a desirable change? I would have expected sort to be equivalent to using order. Thanks, Stephen -Original Message- From: Duncan Murdoch [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, August 03, 2006 11:33 AM To: Ponzio, Stephen [CIB-LAVA] Cc: r-devel@stat.math.ethz.ch; [EMAIL

Re: [Rd] seq improperly increments dates (PR#9120)

2006-08-03 Thread Ponzio, Stephen [CIB-LAVA]
th = March 2), in my opinion. That is what I expected, anyway. Thanks, Stephen -Original Message- From: Duncan Murdoch [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, August 03, 2006 11:24 AM To: Ponzio, Stephen [CIB-LAVA] Cc: r-devel@stat.math.ethz.ch; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [Rd] seq i