On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 3:27 PM, Simon Urbanek
simon.urba...@r-project.org wrote:
I suspect the problem could be classified as bug in methods which doesn't
behave correctly if not attached. I didn't look into details, but there used
to be a technical problem in R C API where you could not
To state the issue that Kirill raised in a different way... A package
with S4 or reference classes and Depends:methods can throw an error
when you do something as simple as this:
Rscript -e mypackage::foo()
But this will work:
Rscript -e library(mypackage); foo()
This is because when
On 11/02/2014 12:06 PM, Winston Chang wrote:
To state the issue that Kirill raised in a different way... A package
with S4 or reference classes and Depends:methods can throw an error
when you do something as simple as this:
Rscript -e mypackage::foo()
But this will work:
Rscript -e
On 02/11/2014 09:06 AM, Winston Chang wrote:
To state the issue that Kirill raised in a different way... A package
with S4 or reference classes and Depends:methods can throw an error
when you do something as simple as this:
Rscript -e mypackage::foo()
But this will work:
Rscript -e
On Feb 11, 2014, at 1:28 PM, Martin Morgan mtmor...@fhcrc.org wrote:
On 02/11/2014 09:06 AM, Winston Chang wrote:
To state the issue that Kirill raised in a different way... A package
with S4 or reference classes and Depends:methods can throw an error
when you do something as simple as this:
Hi
Accesses the $new method for a class defined in a package fails if the
methods package is not loaded. I have created a test package with the
following single code file:
newTest - function() {
cl - get(someClass)
cl$new
}
someClass - setRefClass(someClass)
(This is similar to code
Because depends is treated incorrectly (if I may place a value
judgement on it). I had an earlier thread on this, not sure if any
changes have taken place since then:
http://r.789695.n4.nabble.com/Dependencies-of-Imports-not-attached-td4666529.html
On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 5:53 PM, Kirill Müller
On 02/11/2014 03:22 AM, Peter Meilstrup wrote:
Because depends is treated incorrectly (if I may place a value
judgement on it). I had an earlier thread on this, not sure if any
changes have taken place since then:
http://r.789695.n4.nabble.com/Dependencies-of-Imports-not-attached-td4666529.html
On 11 February 2014 at 02:53, Kirill Müller wrote:
| Why does it seem to be necessary to load the methods package here?
Just use littler (TM pending).
It (auto-)load methods automagically, thanks to Jeff Horner. See below.
edd@max:~$ chmod 0755 /tmp/kirill.r
edd@max:~$ /tmp/kirill.r
