Hello,
I notice in main/arithmetic.c, that NA and NaN are encoded
differently(since every numeric NA comes from R_NaReal which is
defined via ValueOfNA)
. What is the benefit of treating these two differently? Why can't NA
be a synonym for NaN?
Thank you
Saptarshi
(R-2.9)
On 31-Dec-09 20:43:43, Saptarshi Guha wrote:
Hello,
I notice in main/arithmetic.c, that NA and NaN are encoded
differently(since every numeric NA comes from R_NaReal which is
defined via ValueOfNA)
What is the benefit of treating these two differently? Why can't NA
be a synonym for NaN?
On 31/12/2009 3:43 PM, Saptarshi Guha wrote:
Hello,
I notice in main/arithmetic.c, that NA and NaN are encoded
differently(since every numeric NA comes from R_NaReal which is
defined via ValueOfNA)
. What is the benefit of treating these two differently? Why can't NA
be a synonym for NaN?
I