On 9/13/2005 1:55 PM, Gabor Grothendieck wrote:
> Thanks. That's great. If I understand correctly, versions that
> are as of the one you just uploaded will have this facility and for older
> versions I need to search in the old, existing, way. Thus once 2.3, say,
> comes out we will have 2.2. and
Thanks. That's great. If I understand correctly, versions that
are as of the one you just uploaded will have this facility and for older
versions I need to search in the old, existing, way. Thus once 2.3, say,
comes out we will have 2.2. and 2.3 in the registry.
That means that as of 2.3 it will
On 9/9/2005 10:11 PM, Gabor Grothendieck wrote:
> On 9/9/05, Duncan Murdoch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> I've just committed some changes to allow R to be built and to use
>> MikTeX without needing the Rd.sty files to be installed to localtexmf.
>> Unfortunately, the changes are not compatible wit
On 9/9/05, Duncan Murdoch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I've just committed some changes to allow R to be built and to use
> MikTeX without needing the Rd.sty files to be installed to localtexmf.
> Unfortunately, the changes are not compatible with other TeX packages,
> so if you're not using MikTeX