On Fri, 10 Feb 2012 13:18:38 +0100,
Titus von der Malsburg (TvdM) wrote:
Hi list,
I'm using the package XML to create a simple XML document.
Unfortunately constructing the XML tree is extremely slow. My code
(see below) adds only about 100 nodes per second on an Intel i5
Hi list,
I'm using the package XML to create a simple XML document.
Unfortunately constructing the XML tree is extremely slow. My code
(see below) adds only about 100 nodes per second on an Intel i5
machine. There's clearly something wrong but I don't see what.
Here's a sample of the XML
On Fri, Feb 10, 2012 at 1:40 PM, Friedrich Leisch wrote:
Have you considered simply writing the XML using standard functions
like cat() and friends? That can be much faster than creating an XML
object and writing that out (have just done that to write exams into
our e-learning platform via
Le vendredi 10 février 2012 à 13:18 +0100, Titus von der Malsburg a
écrit :
Hi list,
I'm using the package XML to create a simple XML document.
Unfortunately constructing the XML tree is extremely slow. My code
(see below) adds only about 100 nodes per second on an Intel i5
machine.
On Fri, Feb 10, 2012 at 2:10 PM, Milan Bouchet-Valat nalimi...@club.fr wrote:
Le vendredi 10 février 2012 à 13:18 +0100, Titus von der Malsburg a
écrit :
Just a guess, but I'd try creating all 'Marker' nodes first, storing
them in a 'markers' list, and then calling addChildren(markernode,
Le vendredi 10 février 2012 à 17:36 +0100, Titus von der Malsburg a
écrit :
On Fri, Feb 10, 2012 at 2:10 PM, Milan Bouchet-Valat nalimi...@club.fr
wrote:
Le vendredi 10 février 2012 à 13:18 +0100, Titus von der Malsburg a
écrit :
Just a guess, but I'd try creating all 'Marker' nodes
On Fri, Feb 10, 2012 at 6:43 PM, Milan Bouchet-Valat nalimi...@club.fr wrote:
Doesn't sound so bad to me. I don't think you'll find a use case where
3s will really be a problem.
Actually I have exactly such a case because I have to produce many
such documents and a difference of two orders of
