Re: [Rd] Including full text of open source licenses in a package

2020-09-12 Thread Hadley Wickham
On Saturday, September 12, 2020, Hugh Parsonage wrote: > Perhaps I have misread that excerpt from WRE, but my read is that > package authors should not duplicate GNU COPYING, since it is present > in all R distributions already when using GPL-2 and friends. It > doesn't apply to packages

Re: [Rd] Including full text of open source licenses in a package

2020-09-12 Thread Hugh Parsonage
Perhaps I have misread that excerpt from WRE, but my read is that package authors should not duplicate GNU COPYING, since it is present in all R distributions already when using GPL-2 and friends. It doesn't apply to packages distributed with other licenses. It should be noted that in GPL FAQ

Re: [Rd] Including full text of open source licenses in a package

2020-09-12 Thread Abby Spurdle
> > Including a copy of the license with the work is vital Hmmm... Agree. Just for context: CRAN has a history of being exceptionally useful and efficient. In general, I don't support suggestions to change their submission policies. __

[Rd] Including full text of open source licenses in a package

2020-09-11 Thread Hadley Wickham
Hi all, R-exts currently requests that package authors don't include copies of standard licenses: > Whereas you should feel free to include a license file in your source > distribution, please do > not arrange to install yet another copy of the GNU COPYING or COPYING.LIB > files but > refer to