On Wed, Oct 17, 2007 at 8:59 AM, Luke Tierney wrote:
> Yes, attributes are not preserved, though why that should matter
> given the frequent strong recommendations in this list against
> using attributes on environments or other reference objects is
> beyond me. More importantly, locking and activ
On 10/17/07, Henrik Bengtsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Yes (on the yes), to second Luke. Here is John Chambers' comment when
> I was bitten by the same "bug" a while ago:
>
> http://tolstoy.newcastle.edu.au/R/devel/02b/0524.html
>
> See also Peter Dalgaard's follow up suggesting to wrap up th
Yes (on the yes), to second Luke. Here is John Chambers' comment when
I was bitten by the same "bug" a while ago:
http://tolstoy.newcastle.edu.au/R/devel/02b/0524.html
See also Peter Dalgaard's follow up suggesting to wrap up the
environment in a list, which will typically be enough. I've bee
Yes, attributes are not preserved, though why that should matter
given the frequent strong recommendations in this list against
using attributes on environments or other reference objects is
beyond me. More importantly, locking and active bindings are not
preserved either. Will look into fixing th
Consider a package that this DESCRIPTION file:
---
Package: tester
Version: 0.1-0
Date: 2007-10-12
Title: Prototype object-based programming
Author: Gabor Grothendieck
Maintainer: Gabor Grothendieck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Description: test
LazyLoad: true
Depends: R (>= 2.6.0)
License: GPL2
---
and a
