On Tue, 17 Oct 2006, Hin-Tak Leung wrote:
> Thomas Lumley wrote:
>> On Mon, 16 Oct 2006, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>>
>>> This is a rather interesting, but I don't think it is a bug - it is
>>> just things that "you are not supposed to do"
>>
>> It was a bug. It has been fixed in R 2.4.0. Unfortuna
Thomas Lumley wrote:
> On Mon, 16 Oct 2006, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
>> This is a rather interesting, but I don't think it is a bug - it is
>> just things that "you are not supposed to do"
>
> It was a bug. It has been fixed in R 2.4.0. Unfortunately, since you
> didn't quote the PR# of the or
On Mon, 16 Oct 2006, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> This is a rather interesting, but I don't think it is a bug - it is
> just things that "you are not supposed to do"
It was a bug. It has been fixed in R 2.4.0. Unfortunately, since you
didn't quote the PR# of the original bug in the subject line yo