Re: [Rd] Perils of R_LIBRARY_PATH

2008-02-18 Thread Hin-Tak Leung
Prof Brian Ripley wrote: > On Sat, 16 Feb 2008, Hin-Tak Leung wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> Just for interest, may I ask which platform are you referring to? >> You are on a commercial unix platform such as solaris, right? > > amd64 Linux -- a bit of tracing shows that to be from a jpackage-d > version

Re: [Rd] Perils of R_LIBRARY_PATH

2008-02-15 Thread Prof Brian Ripley
On Sat, 16 Feb 2008, Hin-Tak Leung wrote: > Hi, > > Just for interest, may I ask which platform are you referring to? > You are on a commercial unix platform such as solaris, right? amd64 Linux -- a bit of tracing shows that to be from a jpackage-d version of the Sun SDK. So my guess is that th

Re: [Rd] Perils of R_LIBRARY_PATH

2008-02-15 Thread Hin-Tak Leung
Hi, Just for interest, may I ask which platform are you referring to? You are on a commercial unix platform such as solaris, right? Older JDK/JRE on unices uses motif as the the AWT peer implementation. The motif toolkit libraries are always found on commercial unices, but for the same reason, no

Re: [Rd] Perils of R_LIBRARY_PATH

2008-02-13 Thread Kurt Hornik
> Prof Brian Ripley writes: > The R front end sets (via etc/ldpath) R_LIBRARY_PATH, including > R_JAVA_LD_LIBRARY_PATH. Perhaps the later is too obliging, as I've just > be caught by it in a way that took me a while to track down. > One of my machines has a Sun jdk1.6.0* JDK installed, and

[Rd] Perils of R_LIBRARY_PATH

2008-02-13 Thread Prof Brian Ripley
The R front end sets (via etc/ldpath) R_LIBRARY_PATH, including R_JAVA_LD_LIBRARY_PATH. Perhaps the later is too obliging, as I've just be caught by it in a way that took me a while to track down. One of my machines has a Sun jdk1.6.0* JDK installed, and as a result we have ${R_JAVA_LD_LIBRARY