Gabor Grothendieck wrote:
I wasn't claiming there was an ambiguity but it does not perform
according to the operator precedence documented in ?Syntax . If it
performed as documented it would give an error.
There are a few other errors in that page, e.g. saying that [ has
greater priority
On 21/02/2010 12:44 PM, Duncan Murdoch wrote:
Gabor Grothendieck wrote:
I wasn't claiming there was an ambiguity but it does not perform
according to the operator precedence documented in ?Syntax . If it
performed as documented it would give an error.
There are a few other errors in that
In ?Syntax [ is given as higher priority than $ but BOD$demand[3]
seems to be the same as (BOD$demand)[3] contrary to [ being higher
priority.
BOD$demand[3]
[1] 19
(BOD$demand)[3]
[1] 19
What is the rule being used here?
__
R-devel@r-project.org
On Sat, Feb 20, 2010 at 9:52 AM, Gabor Grothendieck
ggrothendi...@gmail.com wrote:
In ?Syntax [ is given as higher priority than $ but BOD$demand[3]
seems to be the same as (BOD$demand)[3] contrary to [ being higher
priority.
BOD$demand[3]
[1] 19
(BOD$demand)[3]
[1] 19
What is the rule
I wasn't claiming there was an ambiguity but it does not perform
according to the operator precedence documented in ?Syntax . If it
performed as documented it would give an error.
On Sat, Feb 20, 2010 at 6:57 AM, Barry Rowlingson
b.rowling...@lancaster.ac.uk wrote:
On Sat, Feb 20, 2010 at 9:52
