Early on I had been wondering if deprecating I() and the AsIs class would
be a way to get the problem to go away. I imagine (based on no data at
all!) that they are rarely used. If I were writing the same code today, I
would use options(stringsAsFactors=FALSE) instead of sprinkling I() here
and
MacQueen, Don macque...@llnl.gov
on Mon, 8 Sep 2014 16:06:21 + writes:
I have found that order() fails in a rather arcane circumstance, as in
this example:
foo - I( c('x','\265g') )
order(foo)
Error in if (xi xj) 1L else -1L : missing value where TRUE/FALSE
It's actually a little more complicated. I wrote a note, but it seems to be
stuck in the outbox on my home machine (I probably forgot to click Send...).
One important aspect is that
x \265g
[1] NA
which makes me wonder if the bug really is in the case that works. It seems
that it is
] Problem with order() and I()
MacQueen, Don macque...@llnl.gov
on Mon, 8 Sep 2014 16:06:21 + writes:
I have found that order() fails in a rather arcane circumstance, as in
this example:
foo - I( c('x','\265g') )
order(foo)
Error in if (xi xj) 1L else -1L
peter dalgaard pda...@gmail.com
on Tue, 9 Sep 2014 16:36:19 +0200 writes:
It's actually a little more complicated. I wrote a note, but it seems to
be stuck in the outbox on my home machine (I probably forgot to click Send...).
One important aspect is that
x \265g
[1]
[This is the note I alluded to earlier today.]
On 08 Sep 2014, at 18:06 , MacQueen, Don macque...@llnl.gov wrote:
I have found that order() fails in a rather arcane circumstance, as in
this example:
foo - I( c('x','\265g') )
order(foo)
Error in if (xi xj) 1L else -1L : missing value
I have found that order() fails in a rather arcane circumstance, as in
this example:
foo - I( c('x','\265g') )
order(foo)
Error in if (xi xj) 1L else -1L : missing value where TRUE/FALSE needed
foo -c('x','\265g')
order(foo)
[1] 1 2
sessionInfo()
R version 3.1.1 (2014-07-10)
Platform:
