> "PJ" == Paul Johnson
> on Thu, 3 May 2012 12:09:08 -0500 writes:
PJ> Greetings: On Thu, May 3, 2012 at 11:36 AM, Brian
PJ> G. Peterson wrote:
>> On Thu, 2012-05-03 at 10:51 -0500, Paul Johnson wrote:
>>> If somebody in R Core would like this and think about
>>>
On Thu, May 3, 2012 at 12:19 PM, Brian G. Peterson wrote:
> On Thu, 2012-05-03 at 12:09 -0500, Paul Johnson wrote:
>> Greetings:
>>
>> On Thu, May 3, 2012 at 11:36 AM, Brian G. Peterson
>> wrote:
>> > On Thu, 2012-05-03 at 10:51 -0500, Paul Johnson wrote:
>> >> If somebody in R Core would like t
On Thu, 2012-05-03 at 12:09 -0500, Paul Johnson wrote:
> Greetings:
>
> On Thu, May 3, 2012 at 11:36 AM, Brian G. Peterson
> wrote:
> > On Thu, 2012-05-03 at 10:51 -0500, Paul Johnson wrote:
> >> If somebody in R Core would like this and think about putting it, or
> >> something like it, into th
Greetings:
On Thu, May 3, 2012 at 11:36 AM, Brian G. Peterson wrote:
> On Thu, 2012-05-03 at 10:51 -0500, Paul Johnson wrote:
>> If somebody in R Core would like this and think about putting it, or
>> something like it, into the base, then many chores involving predicted
>> values would become mu
On Thu, 2012-05-03 at 10:51 -0500, Paul Johnson wrote:
> If somebody in R Core would like this and think about putting it, or
> something like it, into the base, then many chores involving predicted
> values would become much easier.
>
Why does this need to be in base? Implement it in a package.
Greetings:
I'm still working on functions to make it easier for students to
interpret regression predictions. I am working out a scheme to
more easily create "newdata" objects (for use in predict functions).
This has been done before in packages like Zelig, Effects,
rms, and others. Nothing is "e
