Re: [Rd] R 2.3.1 release candidates starting tomorrow

2006-05-26 Thread Prof Brian Ripley
On Sat, 27 May 2006, Andrew Robinson wrote: > Hi all, > > it builds just fine, but I get a warning on FreeBSD 6.1 That is a warning in a contributed package. It stems from date.POSIXdate.R:as.data.frame.difftime <-as.data.frame.vector and as.data.frame.vector differs by R version. So it's just

Re: [Rd] R 2.3.1 release candidates starting tomorrow

2006-05-26 Thread Dirk Eddelbuettel
On 26 May 2006 at 17:47, Peter Dalgaard wrote: | | Starting with tomorrow's build, the beta designation will be replaced | by RC. This also implies that we are in "hard" code freeze, and that | we're not going to change anything unless it is critical. If you do | not want such critical bugs to sl

Re: [Rd] R 2.3.1 release candidates starting tomorrow

2006-05-26 Thread Andrew Robinson
Hi all, it builds just fine, but I get a warning on FreeBSD 6.1 less /usr/local/testing/R-beta/tests/survival.Rcheck/00check.log * using log directory '/usr/local/testing/R-beta/tests/survival.Rcheck' * using Version 2.3.1 beta (2006-05-25 r38197) * checking for file 'survival/DESCRIPTION' ... OK

[Rd] R 2.3.1 release candidates starting tomorrow

2006-05-26 Thread Peter Dalgaard
Starting with tomorrow's build, the beta designation will be replaced by RC. This also implies that we are in "hard" code freeze, and that we're not going to change anything unless it is critical. If you do not want such critical bugs to slip into the final release, please check the release candid