Re: [Rd] Running package tests and not stop on first fail

2016-11-09 Thread Jan Gorecki
Sorry for late reply. I like the stop-on-error. Thanks for merging. Glad to be R contributor! On 4 November 2016 at 09:42, Oliver Keyes wrote: > On Friday, 4 November 2016, Martin Maechler > wrote: >> >> > Dirk Eddelbuettel >> > on Fri, 4 Nov 2016 10:36:52 -0500 writes: >> >> >

Re: [Rd] Running package tests and not stop on first fail

2016-11-08 Thread Hervé Pagès
Thanks Martin. These changes are great and improve the usefulness of 'R CMD check'. Especially in the context of the Bioconductor daily builds where we'll use --no-stop-on-test-error so developers will get a full picture of all the errors in their package at once. Cheers, H. To provide some con

Re: [Rd] Running package tests and not stop on first fail

2016-11-08 Thread Martin Maechler
> Hervé Pagès > on Mon, 7 Nov 2016 14:37:15 -0800 writes: > On 11/05/2016 01:53 PM, Martin Maechler wrote: >>> Oliver Keyes >>> on Fri, 4 Nov 2016 12:42:54 -0400 writes: >> >> > On Friday, 4 November 2016, Martin Maechler >> > wrote: >> >> >

Re: [Rd] Running package tests and not stop on first fail

2016-11-07 Thread Hervé Pagès
On 11/05/2016 01:53 PM, Martin Maechler wrote: Oliver Keyes on Fri, 4 Nov 2016 12:42:54 -0400 writes: > On Friday, 4 November 2016, Martin Maechler > wrote: >> > Dirk Eddelbuettel > >> > on Fri, 4 Nov 2016 10:36:52 -0500 writes: >> >> > On 4 November 201

Re: [Rd] Running package tests and not stop on first fail

2016-11-05 Thread Martin Maechler
> Oliver Keyes > on Fri, 4 Nov 2016 12:42:54 -0400 writes: > On Friday, 4 November 2016, Martin Maechler > wrote: >> > Dirk Eddelbuettel > >> > on Fri, 4 Nov 2016 10:36:52 -0500 writes: >> >> > On 4 November 2016 at 16:24, Martin Maechler wrote: |

Re: [Rd] Running package tests and not stop on first fail

2016-11-04 Thread Oliver Keyes
On Friday, 4 November 2016, Martin Maechler wrote: > > Dirk Eddelbuettel > > > on Fri, 4 Nov 2016 10:36:52 -0500 writes: > > > On 4 November 2016 at 16:24, Martin Maechler wrote: | My > > proposed name '--no-stop-on-error' was a quick shot; if | > > somebody has a more con

Re: [Rd] Running package tests and not stop on first fail

2016-11-04 Thread Martin Maechler
> Dirk Eddelbuettel > on Fri, 4 Nov 2016 10:36:52 -0500 writes: > On 4 November 2016 at 16:24, Martin Maechler wrote: | My > proposed name '--no-stop-on-error' was a quick shot; if | > somebody has a more concise or better "English style" > wording | (which is somewhat

Re: [Rd] Running package tests and not stop on first fail

2016-11-04 Thread Martin Maechler
> Brian G Peterson > on Fri, 4 Nov 2016 10:37:18 -0500 writes: > On Fri, 2016-11-04 at 16:24 +0100, Martin Maechler wrote: >> > Jan Gorecki > on Fri, 4 >> Nov 2016 11:20:37 + writes: >> >> > Martin, I submitted very simple patch on > >> https://bu

Re: [Rd] Running package tests and not stop on first fail

2016-11-04 Thread Brian G. Peterson
On Fri, 2016-11-04 at 16:24 +0100, Martin Maechler wrote: > > Jan Gorecki > > on Fri, 4 Nov 2016 11:20:37 + writes: > > > Martin, I submitted very simple patch on > > https://bugs.r-project.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17176 > > > Herve, While I like your idea, I pref

Re: [Rd] Running package tests and not stop on first fail

2016-11-04 Thread Dirk Eddelbuettel
On 4 November 2016 at 16:24, Martin Maechler wrote: | My proposed name '--no-stop-on-error' was a quick shot; if | somebody has a more concise or better "English style" wording | (which is somewhat compatible with all the other options you see | from 'R CMD check --help'), | please speak up. Wh

Re: [Rd] Running package tests and not stop on first fail

2016-11-04 Thread Martin Maechler
> Jan Gorecki > on Fri, 4 Nov 2016 11:20:37 + writes: > Martin, I submitted very simple patch on > https://bugs.r-project.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17176 > Herve, While I like your idea, I prefer to keep my patch > simple, it is now exactly what Martin mentions

Re: [Rd] Running package tests and not stop on first fail

2016-11-04 Thread Jan Gorecki
Martin, I submitted very simple patch on https://bugs.r-project.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17176 Herve, While I like your idea, I prefer to keep my patch simple, it is now exactly what Martin mentions. I think it is a good start that can eventually be extended later for what you are asking. Reg

Re: [Rd] Running package tests and not stop on first fail

2016-11-03 Thread Hervé Pagès
Hi Martin, Jan, On 11/03/2016 03:45 AM, Martin Maechler wrote: Jan Gorecki on Tue, 1 Nov 2016 22:51:28 + writes: > Hello community/devs, Is there an option to run package > tests during R CMD check and not stop on first error? I > know that testing frameworks (testhat and

Re: [Rd] Running package tests and not stop on first fail

2016-11-03 Thread Martin Maechler
> Jan Gorecki > on Tue, 1 Nov 2016 22:51:28 + writes: > Hello community/devs, Is there an option to run package > tests during R CMD check and not stop on first error? I > know that testing frameworks (testhat and others) can do > that but asking about just R and b

[Rd] Running package tests and not stop on first fail

2016-11-01 Thread Jan Gorecki
Hello community/devs, Is there an option to run package tests during R CMD check and not stop on first error? I know that testing frameworks (testhat and others) can do that but asking about just R and base packages. Currently when package check runs test scripts in ./tests directory it will stop a