You can always check eg the Matrix package to show you how it's done.
Cheers
Joris
On Sat, Sep 23, 2017 at 6:17 PM, Iñaki Úcar wrote:
> > There is formally no such thing as an S3 class. Just S3 objects with a
> > class attribute. You could extend a base class with an S4 class, like
> > setClass
> There is formally no such thing as an S3 class. Just S3 objects with a
> class attribute. You could extend a base class with an S4 class, like
> setClass("IntegerWithUnits", slots=c(units="Units"),
> contains="integer"). Sure, that's a disruptive change, but it would be
> in the right direction.
On Fri, Sep 22, 2017 at 10:28 AM, Iñaki Úcar wrote:
> 2017-09-22 19:04 GMT+02:00 Michael Lawrence :
>> The %*% function is a primitive. As it says in the documentation under
>> ?Methods_Details
>>
>> Methods may be defined for most primitives, and corresponding
>> metadata objects will b
2017-09-22 19:04 GMT+02:00 Michael Lawrence :
> The %*% function is a primitive. As it says in the documentation under
> ?Methods_Details
>
> Methods may be defined for most primitives, and corresponding
> metadata objects will be created to store them. Calls to the
> primitive still
The %*% function is a primitive. As it says in the documentation under
?Methods_Details
Methods may be defined for most primitives, and corresponding
metadata objects will be created to store them. Calls to the
primitive still go directly to the C code, which will sometimes
che
Hi all,
I'm trying to implement the matrix multiplication operator, which is
S4 generic, for an old-style S3 class. The following works as
expected:
x <- 1:10
class(x) <- "myClass"
setOldClass("myClass")
setGeneric("myMethod", function(x, y) standardGeneric("myMethod"))
setMethod("myMethod", c("
