Re: [Rd] Status of R 2.4.0 in svn repository and R-Admin manual

2006-10-04 Thread Peter Dalgaard
Gavin Simpson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Wed, 2006-10-04 at 15:03 +0200, Peter Dalgaard wrote: > > Gavin Simpson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > > > Dear list, > > > > > > I have been using and testing the alpha/betas of R 2.4.0, sources for > > > which I got from svn.r-project.org/R/bra

Re: [Rd] Status of R 2.4.0 in svn repository and R-Admin manual

2006-10-04 Thread Gavin Simpson
On Wed, 2006-10-04 at 15:03 +0200, Peter Dalgaard wrote: > Gavin Simpson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > Dear list, > > > > I have been using and testing the alpha/betas of R 2.4.0, sources for > > which I got from svn.r-project.org/R/branches/R-2-4-branch, and which I > > compiled on my Fedora

Re: [Rd] Status of R 2.4.0 in svn repository and R-Admin manual

2006-10-04 Thread Peter Dalgaard
Gavin Simpson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Dear list, > > I have been using and testing the alpha/betas of R 2.4.0, sources for > which I got from svn.r-project.org/R/branches/R-2-4-branch, and which I > compiled on my Fedora Core 5 machine. No problems there. I have just > updated the source tr

[Rd] Status of R 2.4.0 in svn repository and R-Admin manual

2006-10-04 Thread Gavin Simpson
Dear list, I have been using and testing the alpha/betas of R 2.4.0, sources for which I got from svn.r-project.org/R/branches/R-2-4-branch, and which I compiled on my Fedora Core 5 machine. No problems there. I have just updated the source tree today and re-compiled - which also works just fine.