Re: [Rd] Wrong config check for __libc_stack_end

2016-02-01 Thread Simon Urbanek
On Feb 1, 2016, at 12:32 PM, Martin Maechler wrote: >> Simon Urbanek >>on Mon, 1 Feb 2016 08:36:56 -0500 writes: > >> On Feb 1, 2016, at 4:16 AM, Martin Maechler >> wrote: > > [..]

Re: [Rd] Wrong config check for __libc_stack_end

2016-02-01 Thread Martin Maechler
> Alba Pompeo > on Fri, 29 Jan 2016 08:23:26 -0200 writes: > Here is my log from 'make check' using an Intel i5 64-bit > processor - http://pastebin.com/raw/N6SYAuFX Here is > Isaac's log from 'make check' using an Intel Atom 32-bit > processor -

Re: [Rd] Wrong config check for __libc_stack_end

2016-02-01 Thread Simon Urbanek
On Feb 1, 2016, at 4:16 AM, Martin Maechler wrote: >> Alba Pompeo >>on Fri, 29 Jan 2016 08:23:26 -0200 writes: > >> Here is my log from 'make check' using an Intel i5 64-bit >> processor - http://pastebin.com/raw/N6SYAuFX Here is

Re: [Rd] Wrong config check for __libc_stack_end

2016-02-01 Thread Simon Urbanek
On Feb 1, 2016, at 9:56 AM, Alba Pompeo wrote: > @Simon. Here's what I did. > I checked out R revision 70059. > Ran export r_cv_libc_stack_end=no. (otherwise it would give that error > we talked about before) No, the whole point was to test this behavior. I see that the

Re: [Rd] Wrong config check for __libc_stack_end

2016-02-01 Thread Alba Pompeo
@Simon. Here's what I did. I checked out R revision 70059. Ran export r_cv_libc_stack_end=no. (otherwise it would give that error we talked about before) Ran ./configure --without-recommended-packages. (otherwise it would complain of not finding ./src/library/Recommended/MASS_*.tar.gz) Ran make.

Re: [Rd] Wrong config check for __libc_stack_end

2016-02-01 Thread Alba Pompeo
But it looks like R is working. I found the R binary on build/bin/R I ran it and it works. Should I be worried about the make check log? @Isaac Dunham Can you please test this on your system too? Maybe R can be packaged soon? Ciao. On Mon, Feb 1, 2016 at 3:33 PM, Alba Pompeo