If you can add it to the magic package, that would be great. It seems like
the appropriate place for it. It would probably be useful to combine that
with the adrop function or apldrop function in order to allow transparent
extraction of subarrays. Perhaps the default could be "drop=FALSE" (please!
On 19 Oct 2006, at 14:26, Gabor Grothendieck wrote:
> Note that it can also be done like with do.call:
>
> a <- array(1:24, 2:4)
> L <- list(TRUE, 1:3, c(4, 2))
> do.call("[", c(list(a), L))
>
aargggh, you beat me to it. I didn't think to pass TRUE to "[" .
I'll stick it in the package wit
Note that it can also be done like with do.call:
a <- array(1:24, 2:4)
L <- list(TRUE, 1:3, c(4, 2))
do.call("[", c(list(a), L))
On 10/19/06, Balaji S. Srinivasan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I recently encountered a problem with array subsetting and came up with a
> fix. Given an array o
Hi
Your arraytake() function does indeed do something
that can't be done elegantly by apltake(), AFAICS
I think that arraytake() would make a splendid addition
to the magic package.
Would that be acceptable?
best wishes
rksh
[I can't help thinking that a judicious use of do.call() could
rep
Hi,
I recently encountered a problem with array subsetting and came up with a
fix. Given an array of arbitrary dimensions, in which the number of
dimensions is only known at runtime, I wanted to extract a subarray. The
main issue with doing this is that in order to extract a subarray from an
array
