> -Original Message-
> From: Prof Brian Ripley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Friday, August 24, 2007 2:00 AM
> To: Duncan Murdoch
> Cc: Latchezar (Lucho) Dimitrov; r-devel@r-project.org
> Subject: Re: [Rd] compiling R under cygwin
>
> On Thu, 23 Aug 20
On Thu, 23 Aug 2007, Duncan Murdoch wrote:
> The issue is compatibility with other Windows programs. /path/to/file works
> in lots of Windows programs, and is interpreted relative to the current
> drive. In the common situation where the user only has one partition which
> is mounted as C:, i
> -Original Message-
> From: Duncan Murdoch [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, August 23, 2007 9:15 PM
> To: Latchezar (Lucho) Dimitrov
> Cc: Prof Brian Ripley; Denham Robert; r-devel@r-project.org
> Subject: Re: [Rd] compiling R under cygwin
>
&g
Cc: r-devel@r-project.org; Duncan Murdoch
>> Subject: Re: [Rd] compiling R under cygwin
>>
>> On Thu, 23 Aug 2007, Denham Robert wrote:
>>
>>>>> For various reasons,
>>>> I think it is only courteous to mention some good reasons
>> if you w
--Original Message-
> From: Gabor Grothendieck [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, August 23, 2007 5:02 PM
> To: Latchezar (Lucho) Dimitrov
> Cc: r-devel@r-project.org
> Subject: Re: [Rd] compiling R under cygwin
>
> Many people, probably about half, of R users are Window
> Finally I just wanted to have my vote put there (apparently not where
> your vote is) not to argue.
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Gabor Grothendieck [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Sent: Thursday, August 23, 2007 4:01 PM
> > To: Latchezar (Lucho) Dimitrov
01 PM
> To: Latchezar (Lucho) Dimitrov
> Cc: r-devel@r-project.org
> Subject: Re: [Rd] compiling R under cygwin
>
> Having it be the same under cygwin as it is for other UNIX
> systems would be ok but for the native Windows port R should
> behave like other Windows applicatio
sage-
> > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Prof Brian Ripley
> > Sent: Thursday, August 23, 2007 2:54 AM
> > To: Denham Robert
> > Cc: r-devel@r-project.org; Duncan Murdoch
> > Subject: Re: [Rd] compiling R under c
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Prof Brian Ripley
> Sent: Thursday, August 23, 2007 2:54 AM
> To: Denham Robert
> Cc: r-devel@r-project.org; Duncan Murdoch
> Subject: Re: [Rd] compiling R under cygwin
>
gt; -Original Message-
> From: Prof Brian Ripley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, 21 August 2007 9:53 PM
> To: Duncan Murdoch
> Cc: Denham Robert; r-devel@r-project.org
> Subject: Re: [Rd] compiling R under cygwin
>
> Yes,
>
>> What is the advantage of bui
rw.qld.gov.au
Department of Natural Resources & Water
QScape Building, 80 Meiers Road, Indooroopilly Qld 4068
-Original Message-
From: Prof Brian Ripley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, 21 August 2007 9:53 PM
To: Duncan Murdoch
Cc: Denham Robert; r-devel@r-project.org
Subject:
Gabor Grothendieck wrote:
> Besides Cygwin and VMware there is also the coLinux kernel which is
> a native Linux kernel that runs on Windows. I have run R with the AndLinux
> distro based on Ubuntu/coLinux/Xming on top of Windows with some success.
> It has the advantage that it runs much faster
On Tue, 21 Aug 2007, Prof Brian Ripley wrote:
> Yes,
>
>> What is the advantage of building this?
>
> was my question too. If you want a Unix-like version of R on PC hardware
> running Windows why not run a Unix-like OS under a virtual machine?
>
> Quite a lot of the details are wrong: using FLIB
On 8/21/2007 10:57 AM, M. Edward (Ed) Borasky wrote:
> Prof Brian Ripley wrote:
>> Yes,
>>
>>> What is the advantage of building this?
>>
>> was my question too. If you want a Unix-like version of R on PC hardware
>> running Windows why not run a Unix-like OS under a virtual machine?
>>
>> Qui
On 8/21/07, M. Edward (Ed) Borasky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Prof Brian Ripley wrote:
> > Yes,
> >
> >> What is the advantage of building this?
> >
> > was my question too. If you want a Unix-like version of R on PC hardware
> > running Windows why not run a Unix-like OS under a virtual machine
Prof Brian Ripley wrote:
> Yes,
>
>> What is the advantage of building this?
>
> was my question too. If you want a Unix-like version of R on PC hardware
> running Windows why not run a Unix-like OS under a virtual machine?
>
> Quite a lot of the details are wrong: using FLIBS, BLAS_LIBS and L
Yes,
> What is the advantage of building this?
was my question too. If you want a Unix-like version of R on PC hardware
running Windows why not run a Unix-like OS under a virtual machine?
Quite a lot of the details are wrong: using FLIBS, BLAS_LIBS and LIBS as
intended will solve most of the
Denham Robert wrote:
> For various reasons, it suits our workplace to have a cygwin version of
> R. I am pretty sure that cygwin is still not a supported environment
> for R, but we have managed to compile R-2.5.1 under cygwin without too
> many dramas. Our procedure is described below. We still
For various reasons, it suits our workplace to have a cygwin version of
R. I am pretty sure that cygwin is still not a supported environment
for R, but we have managed to compile R-2.5.1 under cygwin without too
many dramas. Our procedure is described below. We still have a few
problems compilin
19 matches
Mail list logo
