On 11/17/2011 2:12 PM, Uwe Ligges wrote:
External BLASs work for me perfectly on other platforms than cygwin.
Hence it is cygwin that I would not recommend given the native Windows
version is both faster and passes the checks.
Uwe Ligges
Yeah,
I am almost sure that your view as R developer
On 17.11.2011 12:33, marco atzeri wrote:
On 11/17/2011 10:11 AM, Uwe Ligges wrote:
Everybody in this discussion invested too much time on it already. If
you want to provide cygwin support for others, go ahead and tackle the
problems, but don't distribute incorrectly working versions of R.
D
On 11/17/2011 10:11 AM, Uwe Ligges wrote:
Everybody in this discussion invested too much time on it already. If
you want to provide cygwin support for others, go ahead and tackle the
problems, but don't distribute incorrectly working versions of R.
Dear Uwe,
first test versions are always by
On 17.11.2011 00:34, marco atzeri wrote:
On 11/16/2011 11:04 PM, peter dalgaard wrote:
On Nov 16, 2011, at 22:08 , marco atzeri wrote:
On 11/16/2011 9:32 PM, Prof Brian Ripley wrote:
The failures are *not* minor. Please don't distribute an R linked to a
broken BLAS library. Those tests are
On 11/16/2011 11:04 PM, peter dalgaard wrote:
On Nov 16, 2011, at 22:08 , marco atzeri wrote:
On 11/16/2011 9:32 PM, Prof Brian Ripley wrote:
The failures are *not* minor. Please don't distribute an R linked to a
broken BLAS library. Those tests are not for fun: they came from real
errors on
On Nov 16, 2011, at 22:08 , marco atzeri wrote:
> On 11/16/2011 9:32 PM, Prof Brian Ripley wrote:
>> The failures are *not* minor. Please don't distribute an R linked to a
>> broken BLAS library. Those tests are not for fun: they came from real
>> errors on real problems.
>>
>
> Dear Brian,
> I
On 11/16/2011 9:32 PM, Prof Brian Ripley wrote:
The failures are *not* minor. Please don't distribute an R linked to a
broken BLAS library. Those tests are not for fun: they came from real
errors on real problems.
Dear Brian,
I am reasonable sure that the cygwin blas library are fine, have
you
The failures are *not* minor. Please don't distribute an R linked to
a broken BLAS library. Those tests are not for fun: they came from
real errors on real problems.
On Wed, 16 Nov 2011, marco atzeri wrote:
On 11/12/2011 3:25 PM, Mark Carter wrote:
I tried to build R-2.14.0 on cygwin using
On 11/12/2011 3:25 PM, Mark Carter wrote:
I tried to build R-2.14.0 on cygwin using the commands:
./configure --with-x=no
make
I started to get a whole lot of errors starting with:
/cygdrive/c/Users/mcarter/src/R-2.14.0/src/modules/internet/Rhttpd.c:275:
undefined reference to `_R_InputHandlers
On Sat, 12 Nov 2011, peter dalgaard wrote:
On Nov 12, 2011, at 15:25 , Mark Carter wrote:
I tried to build R-2.14.0 on cygwin using the commands:
./configure --with-x=no
make
I started to get a whole lot of errors starting with:
/cygdrive/c/Users/mcarter/src/R-2.14.0/src/modules/internet/Rht
On 12.11.2011 21:28, peter dalgaard wrote:
On Nov 12, 2011, at 15:25 , Mark Carter wrote:
I tried to build R-2.14.0 on cygwin using the commands:
./configure --with-x=no
make
I started to get a whole lot of errors starting with:
/cygdrive/c/Users/mcarter/src/R-2.14.0/src/modules/internet/Rh
On Nov 12, 2011, at 15:25 , Mark Carter wrote:
> I tried to build R-2.14.0 on cygwin using the commands:
> ./configure --with-x=no
> make
>
> I started to get a whole lot of errors starting with:
> /cygdrive/c/Users/mcarter/src/R-2.14.0/src/modules/internet/Rhttpd.c:275:
> undefined reference t
I tried to build R-2.14.0 on cygwin using the commands:
./configure --with-x=no
make
I started to get a whole lot of errors starting with:
/cygdrive/c/Users/mcarter/src/R-2.14.0/src/modules/internet/Rhttpd.c:275:
undefined reference to `_R_InputHandlers'
which I have pasted at
http://pastebin.c
13 matches
Mail list logo
